Michoulicious
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2014
- 6,920
- 7,296
Close.
Kadri has obviously better offensive abilities/hands, but Danault is the perfect defensive C that can compliment talented wingers and dominate 5on5. His advanced stats with Tatar/Gallagher are just crazy. Kadri is obviously a lot better if you need someone on your PP.
Given the fact Danault is 2 years younger and looks to be still improving at 27, I'd go with him, but it is a close call.
Would be fun to see how both perform in the playoffs. Montreal do not make the playoffs, and Kadri keeps finding creative ways not to play in them.
Kadri has obviously better offensive abilities/hands, but Danault is the perfect defensive C that can compliment talented wingers and dominate 5on5. His advanced stats with Tatar/Gallagher are just crazy. Kadri is obviously a lot better if you need someone on your PP.
Given the fact Danault is 2 years younger and looks to be still improving at 27, I'd go with him, but it is a close call.
Would be fun to see how both perform in the playoffs. Montreal do not make the playoffs, and Kadri keeps finding creative ways not to play in them.