Here's the part I don't get. The majority of the fan base, media and the team is shoving Kessel out the door for needing to be propped up defensively, and not contributing enough to gaining possession of the puck.
Exhibit A
~ 5 mins of ToI against the Habs from 6-7 shifts that yielded:
- 4 offensive turnovers (1 cleaned up by Panik)
- 3 defensive (1 cleaned up by Robidas)
The fascination with the toe drag was evident from a few shifts, and was the main reason why the 2nd PP unit couldn't penetrate the offensive zone on the one shift.
If having to prop Kessel up is such a huge deal, despite what a great offensive talent he is, why is there so little attention to how much propping up Kadri requires? Granted, he usually cough up the puck THIS much, but it happens often enough to be noteworthy. And he essentially spends most of his time playing alongside a random PK unit much like Kessel does. I certainly don't see him as the same caliber of two-way player as his advanced stats compatibles may suggest.
Are people consciously sweeping it under the rug as a non-issue and something he'll eventually grow out of, or have they completely turned a blind eye to it subconsciously and are not even seeing these plays? Or am I being too hard on Kadri for seeing 7 turnovers in that sequence of shifts?
Either way, I'm starting to think keeping Kadri is the best thing to do for the tank, and he needs to be promoted to Kessel's line ASAP (hopefully once Bozak is traded). You add this amount of turnovers on Kessel and JVR's shoulders, and the line crumbles.