The difference in TOI between Petry and Schultz is actually fairly insignificant and easily explained by the fact Schultz gets a lot of PP time.
Justin Schultz plays over a minute per game more even strength than Petry. That's a big margin. Make no mistake. Schultz is our #1D. Not Petry. Petry is the 2nd line shut down guy.
I'm confused: you say he's been misused as the linchpin and the results would suggest that is so. So how can he also be said to be carrying the D when it's clear his performance has not been up to snuff?
Justin Schultz is a linchpin D because he is by far our best puck mover. The reason it is a bad is because he's too inexperienced to be a 1D in the NHL and he is given bottom pairing talent to play with. If were in Seth Jones' shoes and got to play with someone like Weber he would an unquestioned future top pairing D in this league. On the Oilers he is set up to fail. That's not Justin's fault.
Schultz has played the most minutes with Nick Schultz and Andrew Ference. Both of them put up better results 5 on 5 apart from Schultz than they did with him. He's playing with veteran guys and would seem to be dragging them down.
The Oilers D with Schultz on the ice is very predictable. Schultz is the only one who can move the puck so just focus all attention on him and the Oil will crumble. Ference and Nick Schultz just fought for the puck along the boards and would feed it to Justin so he could start the play. The reason they do better away from Schultz is because Schultz is on the top pairing. When Ference and Nick Schultz get demoted so they can hide on the bottom pairing of course they look better. Their expectation is lower.
I've never before seen anyone suggest that playing a shutdown role is an easy gig. That's just bizarre.
It is easier to play a shutdown role than play transitional D. Shutdown D always have the option to just ditch the puck out of the zone. Transitional D have to be creative. They have to find passes. They have to drive the offense. That is what Schultz did. That's what a top pairing Dman does. Shutdown defensemen play it safe with the puck. Schultz couldn't afford to.
Schultz is a bottom pairing talent who happens to post good PP numbers. He's a more hyped Marc Andre Bergeron.
This doesn't make sense. If a player is causing GA, getting rid of that player doesn't mean those GA will migrate elsewhere. Schultz has shown himself to be a one dimensional player who is also a drag on his partners.
First off his minutes prove he is our top pariing Dman. It might also surprise you to learn that most of Schultz' points were 5 on 5.
I suppose you mean the role he
should be playing. The idea is that Eakins just doesn't know what he's doing and should be giving Petry all these minutes. Let me ask you this: who is supposed to move the puck? Right now Schultz is basically alone on this team. Demoting him makes zero sense. Getting him another capable top pairing puck mover makes too much sense.
Plus minus is one of the most abused stats out there. It MUST be taken along with context. Saying that removing the minus player will solve all the problems is an example of abusing the plus minus stat. As long as Schultz is playing on our top pairing with bottom pairing talents like Ference you cannot blame Schultz on everything that goes wrong on the team and even with his own stats. We should be willing to toss out Schultz' plus minus stat for the same reason that I'm sure the Canucks are tossing out Edler's even worst plus minus. It's the team's fault, not the player's.