Player Discussion John Carlson - Vol. 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Silky mitts

It’s yours boys and girls and babes let’s go!
Mar 9, 2004
4,685
3,701
Sure, it's easy to take shots now but it wasn't an unreasonable take at the time. Carlson was half the player he is now and far less consistent. The conversation, from what I recall, was also heavily steered towards asset management, i.e. are the Caps better with Carlson or a 1st + prospect + Shattenkirk.
The argument against that as far as asset management, they were already losing Williams, Alzner, and Winnik for cap space, ended up losing Mojo too, who else would have gone for Shat and whoever came in a Carlson deal? Best case you lose Oshie and Carlson for Shattenkirk, Williams, and a sell low Carlson return. That’s a Skins move. But I had to get off HFBoards for at least a month after that loss. I can see how others might have too and madness could have reigned.
 

txpd

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
69,649
14,131
New Bern, NC
Sure, it's easy to take shots now but it wasn't an unreasonable take at the time. Carlson was half the player he is now and far less consistent. The conversation, from what I recall, was also heavily steered towards asset management, i.e. are the Caps better with Carlson or a 1st + prospect + Shattenkirk.

Umm. No. Carlson was not half the player he is now. Shattenkirk was already a bust. Yes, heavily asset management. Carlson was going to cost big to keep. Shattenkirk was going to cost big to keep. Asset management says sign the guy you will lose for nothing with the money planned to sign the guy you can trade and get some nice pieces for.

This is why asset management heavy roster management is often a mistake.

Of course in this case, Shattenkirk had no interest in signing with the Caps
 

Raikkonen

Dumb guy
Aug 19, 2009
10,726
3,175
Russia
Not many centerforwards in this chart. Kinda strange.

d52be39e43b3c42325babda9f1ec5a77.png
 

txpd

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
69,649
14,131
New Bern, NC
This start has forced Carlson into the league wide conversation. He is largely a forgettable player that most fans want to overlook in favor of one of their favorites.

Now they have to come up with reasons why he's not that good. Its really funny.
 

maacoshark

Registered User
Jul 22, 2017
9,629
3,723
But ECHL? Ok
I think people here are being very hard on Siegenthaler. He is a very young defenceman with not much NHL experience. Give him some time to develop. He has the tools to be a serviceable NHL player.
 

txpd

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
69,649
14,131
New Bern, NC
I think people here are being very hard on Siegenthaler. He is a very young defenceman with not much NHL experience. Give him some time to develop. He has the tools to be a serviceable NHL player.

Cant get Fever up without a spot in the lineup.
 

hb12xchamps

Registered User
Dec 23, 2011
8,823
5,471
Pennsylvania
I think people here are being very hard on Siegenthaler. He is a very young defenceman with not much NHL experience. Give him some time to develop. He has the tools to be a serviceable NHL player.
Bottom pairing, PK specialist is his ceiling. He will be surpassed by others in the organization in due time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Calicaps

txpd

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
69,649
14,131
New Bern, NC
Bottom pairing, PK specialist is his ceiling. He will be surpassed by others in the organization in due time.

You can tell that after 40 NHL games? I see a guy that's 3rd on the team D in TOI. Who has one of the best even strength goal diffs on the team. A guy who is second on D in SH/TOI on a much improved PK unit. All this on a team that has only lost 2 of their first 10 in regulation. Seems to me he has been pretty solid. Particularly for a rookie. Consider that Carlson has been so able to play an aggressive offensive game with Seigenthaler as his back up. That really says a lot about the kid's play.

I think its way too early to limit the kid as a 3rd pairing at best player
 

Raikkonen

Dumb guy
Aug 19, 2009
10,726
3,175
Russia
I think Siege is modern day Orpik type. There still could be a place for that player on the roster.

Fever-Carlson
Alexeev-Orlov
Siegenthaler-Jensen

Like that

Say in 2 years. After ED. Actually someone is taken in that draft most probably.

There is no Kempny in that. I do believe Kemps is good but his potential is limited. No big enough track record of success, not young, not big, left handed. He is in direct competition with Orlov, Fever and AA. Once two latter guys are in roster someone has to be moved to the right side at minimum. Or elsewhere.

No PP for Kempny. For PK he isn't the first option either. He could lose to his competitors one day.

Hopefully he helps Caps win another cup and Im wrong as usual :P
 

Raikkonen

Dumb guy
Aug 19, 2009
10,726
3,175
Russia
Not so bold prediction: someone is injured in playoffs, Fever gets up and never goes down again in his career. Just like Carlson.
 

hb12xchamps

Registered User
Dec 23, 2011
8,823
5,471
Pennsylvania
You can tell that after 40 NHL games? I see a guy that's 3rd on the team D in TOI. Who has one of the best even strength goal diffs on the team. A guy who is second on D in SH/TOI on a much improved PK unit. All this on a team that has only lost 2 of their first 10 in regulation. Seems to me he has been pretty solid. Particularly for a rookie. Consider that Carlson has been so able to play an aggressive offensive game with Seigenthaler as his back up. That really says a lot about the kid's play.

I think its way too early to limit the kid as a 3rd pairing at best player
Yes I think it's a fair assessment of a player that I've watched a lot of. He has many limitations and plays a very simple game. His skill set is best suited as a 3rd pair type guy. He has very little offensive upside at all, which has shown considering he has 1 assist while playing on the same pairing with the NHL points leader. His team D TOI totals will diminish now that Kempny is back and he gets shifted off the first pairing.
 

Raikkonen

Dumb guy
Aug 19, 2009
10,726
3,175
Russia
Yes I think it's a fair assessment of a player that I've watched a lot of. He has many limitations and plays a very simple game. His skill set is best suited as a 3rd pair type guy. He has very little offensive upside at all, which has shown considering he has 1 assist while playing on the same pairing with the NHL points leader. His team D TOI totals will diminish now that Kempny is back and he gets shifted off the first pairing.

Being strictly 3LD and being able to play 1LD (even if in a pinch) are different. That's valuable for playoffs.

John Carlson couldn't pass to Ovi's wheelhouse once, while being already established player mind you.

So Siege can progress further. It seems he has some significant strength and good mobility for big guy. You can't easily obtain that type of player. Time will tell if the glass is his only breakout option.
 

HSHS

Losing is a disease
Apr 5, 2005
17,981
233
Redondo Beach, Ca
Let’s argue about Seigs here every game to keep this up! So enjoyable to watch him play especially since he’s signed to term!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad