WingsMJN2965
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2017
- 18,106
- 17,699
That contract is all yours, enjoy it
The one good thing about a potential 2019 lockout is the compliance buyout.
That contract is all yours, enjoy it
The one good thing about a potential 2019 lockout is the compliance buyout.
It's a 2020 lockout isn't it?
either way with Seattle coming in I don't know that there will be a lockout having a lockout before an exspansion team comes in is bad for business
The lockout would be in 2020 not 2019.The one good thing about a potential 2019 lockout is the compliance buyout.
The lockout would be in 2020 not 2019.
The CBA is for 10 years, Ending in the 2021/2022 season. From what i read the can opt out after 9 years so that's 2020/2021.Both the NHL and the NHLPA have an opt-out clause in September 2019. If they don't opt out, it ends in 2022.
The new CBA was signed in the 2012/2013 season for 10 years, They can opt out after 9 years. So that's 2020/2021 either way you look at it.Ahh... So they opt-out in September 2019 and then have the 19-20 season to negotiate or the 20-21 season goes on hold, then?
The new CBA was signed in the 2012/2013 season for 10 years, They can opt out after 9 years. So that's 2020/2021 either way you look at it.
Yep just looked it up, They can vote as early as September 2019 on what to do. But the current CBA can't be terminated until September 2020. So i am correct on the 2020/2021 season.The opt out window opens September 2019 for sure, but I think you're right about 20-21. My guess is they can opt out but it wont end for another year, that way you're not suddenly trying to work out a new CBA a week before camp opens.
I'd rather play a little more for a top caliber backup especially when teams like Boston are bringing in guys like Halak and Boston is a team you need to get through to win a championship and this team can win a champion so spend a little more, go get Howard or Kinkaid, somebody that you know can play well if Andersen goes down because right now Andersen is all we got
In fairness, last year, and for starters this year, it doesn't matter who is in net, the buds get squashed by the better Bruins team regardless of who is in net.
I see what you're saying. But Boston brought in Halak because they thought they might need him to play even with Rask healthy. It showed a lack of confidence in their #1. No one in Toronto's front office or coaching staff feels that for Andersen. All we need is injury insurance, not a plan B. If Andersen is healthy, Babcock will start him.
And some other available guys could do that job perfectly. Someone suggested Miller, and that's a good one. He could play a playoff series and not sink this team. Hutchinson has started 30 ish NHL games in a few different seasons. He'd be fine.
I bet Howard would be more expensive than most think. There's a chance Detroit re-signs him, so they won't just toss him away for nothing. So I'd rather not spend our TDL picks and cap space on Howard when we could use it to fill other holes. Just snag someone better than Sparks to be the insurance policy.
If it's just simply better than Sparks then that's not hard to fill, I'd even take Mike Smith over Sparks at this point, because while Mike Smith is having a terrible year he has shown as recently as last year that he is a good NHL goalie I think he's just having a bad stretch, Sparks hasn't shown that he can be a good NHL goalie he is just lucky his team scored 7 goals in Chicago.
I like the Miller idea if we can get him on a short extension.
Andersen/ Miller is a combo I LOVE BUT it leaves us looking for a backup in 2 years at most.
That's why I'd go for Kinkaid because he can solidify that spot for a few years.
I think Andersen/Kinkaid is about as solid as you get
Not likely. Leafs can’t afford to eat a bad contract. For a backup goalie a 2nd is already rich. Howard is worth the pick given how he is plating, but for now he is still a legitimate starter, not a backup, and the Leafs aready have a top-10 starter in net.A 2nd and taking one of our cap dumps would work
Ahh... So they opt-out in September 2019 and then have the 19-20 season to negotiate or the 20-21 season goes on hold, then?
Howard is not a backup goalie, so not sure why you're looking for him as a backup option. He actually has been very solid for us, and I'd rather keep him around now that the boys are starting to win.
Because Garett Sparks is the current backup and that's just not good enough
Not likely. Leafs can’t afford to eat a bad contract. For a backup goalie a 2nd is already rich. Howard is worth the pick given how he is plating, but for now he is still a legitimate starter, not a backup, and the Leafs aready have a top-10 starter in net.
Miller hates the Leafs. Hates them.The way Anaheim looks right now.... I assume we might be moving Miller at the deadline... would be a good vet/leader and great back up for the leaf playoff push.... and I assume miller would be cool spending half a season chasing a cup... Toronto might be best spot for him. Ducks and Toronto have a pretty good history in making trades.... just give us a pick or 2(depending on rounds) and call it a day.
Eh end of career might be best chance at cupMiller hates the Leafs. Hates them.