Too much is made of that. A lot of players who go on to have good careers get waived early on. He was our 2LD before he got hurt last year and seemed to play pretty well during the exhibitions. I thought he should still be on the second pair but am not surprised that Stu is ahead of him. They like Stu. But he is now behind Pardy who was also a waiver pick up.
Edit: Point is I'd expect more for him if he was playing 2nd pair for us. Would we have scored fewer goals in the last 9 periods with him in the line-up?
From the Maurice post practice interview. It sure didn't sound like our head coach is impressed with his game. He isn't getting in the lineup anytime soon unless there's an injury.
You are assuming they are trying to trade Clitsome; perhaps they are instead trying to trade someone like Postma (a recent reintroduction to the lineup and as such a likely candidate to have been showcased). That would indeed be an example of marketing a player.
Actually they signed Pardy as a free agent I believe, but nevertheless I get your point
Right you are. I stand corrected. Still, he was available for a low $$ contract and no assets.
Agreed. I'd also like to point out that the arguably the Jets' greatest asset was acquired as an RFA--along with another alternate captain in Stuart--in exchange for a waiver wire pickup (Peverley) and a player who had cleared waivers somewhat recently at the time (Valabik).
Jets
Thorburn
Penguins
Malkin
Far fairer offer than the one that started the last thread.
The Fourth Period @TFP 1h1 hour ago
Philadelphia Flyers :: Flyers shopping Brayden Schenn http://www.thefourthperiod.com/news/phi141019.html …
Any interest from the Jets?
Any interest from the Jets?
Brandon Gormley may be wanting out of Arizona, I hope the Jets are at least inquiring.
What do you think it would take?
TBH I have lost all faith in Chevy EVER making a significant trade. I keep hoping that something will happen to improve this team but it never does. Gormley could be that something but at what cost?
What do you think it would take?
TBH I have lost all faith in Chevy EVER making a significant trade. I keep hoping that something will happen to improve this team but it never does. Gormley could be that something but at what cost?
They'd probably want a good forward prospect or a young already NHL established guy..Maybe Nic Petan? Not sure.
Talent Analysis
A talented two-way defenseman, Gormley provides skill, poise, and leadership on the back-end. Although he is an all-around defenseman, Gormley is developing into an exceptional offensive player with lethal power-play skills. His ability as a distributor, his hard, accurate shot, and strong in-zone work makes him one of the best defensive prospects in hockey.
No way I give them Petan right now. The Jets might though. I'd give them Lowry but Maurice wouldn't like that. On second thought, I would consider Petan. I was thinking that his potential is too high and still unknown. The 2 are almost the same age and Gormley's upside is maybe even better. We need D. Have to be willing to give up something to get something, right?
Id trade them Lowry for Gormley
Byfuglien for Gormley+ ?
Personally I wouldn't trade Petan unless we are getting an established nhl player.
They do not have the money for Buff, Petan might be the piece to get them to move him we are so week on LD.Byfuglien for Gormley+ ?
Personally I wouldn't trade Petan unless we are getting an established nhl player.
They do not have the money for Buff, Petan might be the piece to get them to move him we are so week on LD.
Byfuglien for Gormley+ ?
Personally I wouldn't trade Petan unless we are getting an established nhl player.
Not to mention that Enstrom seems to have lost an edge over the last couple years and has been taking a beating in the west. If he went down with injury, our LD is scary bad.
no way Lowry is a keeper would rather offer Petan but Gormley has not done anything in NHL If they took Clitsome we all would be happy