Just wondering what his value might be at this point and if Edmonton would be willing to trade him? What would it take?
Value is rock bottom.
Better wait like they did with Yakupov and make sure he's ruined before trading him for a bag of pucks.
I said it was a good idea to wait. Like Yakupov.Yes waiting on a 20 YO sounds like an awful idea for a team in desperate need of young depth
Value is rock bottom.
Better wait like they did with Yakupov and make sure he's completely ruined beyond any possible repair before trading him for a bag of pucks.
I don't see EDM getting what they want for him. If he's moved, I guess it's for a similar young player with a potential high upside, or a slightly older player that has more proven, established numbers but a lower perceived ceiling.
A 15 goal, 30 point career RW with baggage isn't netting a strong return based on potential. At least not if I were a GM. He's intriguing enough to reach out and see what the ask is however.
Something around Dylan Sikura+either Jan Rutta or Brandon Manning?
I didn't make any offer, and I surely don't want him in my team. You may have quoted the wrong guy?This couldn’t be more wrong.
Hitchcock had Puljujarvi out in the final minute of a 1-0 game closing out the Flames. Whatever the HF ‘I want him but only cheap and **** you guys if you won’t do it’ mindset on this player is, the organization likes him and the coach trusts him.
I didn't make any offer, and I surely don't want him in my team. You may have quoted the wrong guy?
I think every team wants a free prospect who was recently drafted that high, regardless what you think he might become, or not become.I didn't make any offer, and I surely don't want him in my team. You may have quoted the wrong guy?
Just wondering what his value might be at this point and if Edmonton would be willing to trade him? What would it take?
No, I’ve got the right guy alright.
Then cool it with the Yakupov garbage. The two players are widely different. Puljujarvi is a sound defensive player that doesn’t shy away from physicality.
I said his value is rock bottom (which it is) and to not sell until he's beyond repair (like you guys did with Yakupov). In case that's not clear enough: don't sell low now, keep the ****ing guy.
His age and potential would be why I make a call. What "proven" asset, however, are you giving up for him?I disagree given that he is 20 years old. And 6'4. Those two things alone will get something decent back.
This couldn’t be more wrong. You come off like a salty fan that make a crap offer for him and got shut down.
Hitchcock had Puljujarvi out in the final minute of a 1-0 game closing out the Flames. Whatever the HF ‘I want him but only cheap and **** you guys if you won’t do it’ mindset on this player is, the organization likes him and the coach trusts him. He’s playing very sound, involved, steady hockey right now on a line with Khaira and RNH and the points are going to come.
Don't go overboard.It wasn't and, it was one or the other.Your not getting that type of overpayment.No, a three years older lesser prospect and a #6 defenceman is not of interest.
He played under 12 minutes in that game. Doesn't sound like Hitch trusts him too much.
Don't go overboard.It wasn't and, it was one or the other.Your not getting that type of overpayment.
Value is rock bottom.
Better wait like they did with Yakupov and make sure he's completely ruined beyond any possible repair before trading him for a bag of pucks.
TVR/McKeown + Carolina 2nd + Buffalo 2nd