I really don't disagree with you, you make fair points. I get that you need bargain contracts, but putting a player in a position so he would produce less to save money is just horrible coaching to me. I don't think any coach or GM would do this, at least not if they respected the team and its fans.
Pitts model is a little difficult to emulate because when Crosby signed he could sign for longer than 8 years, which he did in a lower cap era. Kessel was a gift from Toronto, and Malkin signed for market value at the time.
Fans had sky high expectations for Pulj last year, especially seeing what Laine and Matthews did throughout the year. I think those expectations have settled a little, but he is still a very very very good prospect, who needs to have expectations put on him. They cannot be looking at him as "depth" forward, he is part of the core going forward.
See your bolded portion.
Produce less points doesn't actually have much to do with coaching IMO. You coach to win and individual player points are often just a confusing by-product.
McDavid was +27 this last year. McDavid can absolutely improve significantly, have less points, but end up with a much higher goal differential, and thus help the team win more.
If we roll 4 lines and all of them end up with career lows in points and career highs in goal differential, as long as our specialty teams are average, we make the playoffs and have a good chance at a cup.
Coaching is managing players/lines against opponents players/lines to score more goals regularly than the opponent. Oilers could win every game 1-0 and tear apart league records left right and center.
Putting JP in the top 6 role, especially if those are going to be hard minutes like I think they will be, just so he can rack up a few more points but bleed goals against is absolutely BAD coaching.
Oilers have really emphasized they want JP overall game to improve. Board work and battling. They have repeatedly said his offense is good.
Third line is exactly where he should start this year and be for most this year. Next year is a question mark but if we continue to win with him on the third line AND we get him a bit cheaper price that is obviously the way to go. Eventually he gets bumped up as long as he is playing well and then his points go up accordingly.... in a perfect world :-P
EDIT: I know plus minus is not a good stat, but for the purpose of my example and how it relates to goal differential it works very well.