nstarjim
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2018
- 719
- 184
I never said no valueI didn’t say he was a center, and it definately does lower wennberg’s value. But to say he has no value is idiotic.
I never said no valueI didn’t say he was a center, and it definately does lower wennberg’s value. But to say he has no value is idiotic.
Gotta admit wennberg is pretty low value though. zucker isn't having a good year, but not as bad as wennberg. not even close IMO
And Zucker's got 7 times as many goals in a down year.I mean - Wennberg has 7 fewer points in 2 less games played and isn’t a -2 overall. It’s actually pretty close.
And Zucker's got 7 times as many goals in a down year.
Do you think maybe that the salary cap is why the guy who suggested the trade, had Wennberg included?I’m not the one that’s bothered. And I don’t think you’d find many Columbus fans who who consider a Zucker for Anderson swap. You’ve gotta consider the other team’s needs in a trade. Is a team really going to trade Anderson for Zucker when they’re going to have to re-sign Bob, Panarin, and Duchene? No. Anderson and Zucker are very close in value, if there was no such thing as a salary cap. You just need to start paying attention to more than comparing players.
A top-6 center is definitely a position of need, but another $4m 3C? I'm not seeing it. I mean given the choice between him and Rask yeah, I'd rather have Wennberg, but that's probably not on the table here.Wennberg is also a center vs a wing. Much more responsibility and generally fewer goals and more assists. Also a position of need.
Let's put this into actual perspective. In a trade involving Wennberg for Victor f***ing Rask, the Blue Jackets would have to add.I mean - Wennberg has 7 fewer points in 2 less games played and isn’t a -2 overall. It’s actually pretty close.
A top-6 center is definitely a position of need, but another $4m 3C? I'm not seeing it. I mean given the choice between him and Rask yeah, I'd rather have Wennberg, but that's probably not on the table here.
There might be a team out there that'd find him attractive, but I don't think it's Minnesota.
My main problem with it for Minnesota is that it's just too many lefties. I feel like I'm making handedness the end-all-be-all, but with Coyle gone we've got Kunin and Aberg as right shots in the top-9. At some point we need to add actual RW's.
My secondary problem is that, while I think Wennberg's a heck of a lot more intriguing than Rask, Rask's already on the team. Adding another disappointing $4m Swedish center seems like it's doubling down on a bad move. If Fenton wants to be competitive next year he's got to aim higher than that.
I also liked the Coyle/Donato trade. My only grumble with the return is we lost a righty for a lefty, but I think Donato will be a better fit for our needs overall. With the moves already made and possibly one more in the next 48 hours is going to set us up to make a serious pitch to either Stone or Duchene July 1st is my theory. NO SIMMONDS. A big fan, but I have no doubt he is a declining talent that won't get paid as one.Do you think that's equivalent to Simon and a 1st? I like Donato, but I think I'm higher on Donato than a lot of other people are. I liked the Coyle trade for Minnesota.
I'll admit that me giving an edge to Wennberg when comparing him to Rask probably has a lot to do with familiarity breeding contempt.Admittedly I don't know a whole lot about Wennberg's game, except that it has been a stagnated development. Not sure if it is just a change of scenery Wennberg needs to get his career in gear or he is just a bust. Even with my near complete ignorance of Wennberg's game I'd like him as an option better than Rask. Whom I have seen play a few times when he was with Carolina(2nd fav team). I should say I've seen Carolina play a few times, as I think there were times Rask was literally invisible. Rask might very well be the key to true stealth 007 level technology. I would have rather Fenton made the horsecrap Nino trade for Wennberg over Rask. At least there would have been some potential upside with that return.
I didn't like this post because it confirms my biases. I liked it because you laid all that out without using the word "value."I’m neither a Wild fan nor a Jackets fan. I am a fan of both Zucker and Wennberg. Both are players I’d love to see my favorite team add. I’d pay almost double the assets for Zucker that I would for Wennberg.
I’m a Coyotes fan. We have a 2md rounder currently in the first ten picks of that round. We also have Christian Fischer. I would NOT trade Fischer for a similar 2nd. I don’t think I’d trade Fischer for Wennberg. I’d struggle with paying that early 2nd price for Wennberg. I’d happily trade both assets for Zucker.