Tiranis
Registered User
hearing his interview today, it sounded like he knows he's the new whipping boy and it's unclear how he'll respond to it mentally
Do you happen to have a link?
hearing his interview today, it sounded like he knows he's the new whipping boy and it's unclear how he'll respond to it mentally
Do you happen to have a link?
i heard it about an hour ago on the 5pm hour of team1040...don't have a link but it was a heap of q's from reporters about if he was prepared about how "difficult" the transition to playing in vancouver was and how he feels about being "demoted" to the third pairing with ballard...garrison's responses were diplomatic but not very enthusiastic
bmac of course immediately drew the conclusion that garrison can't feel good getting displaced by a near rookie so early in the season, and i'm sure we'll get a bunch of articles tomorrow about the new ex-panther 9 million dollar third pairing
http://espn.go.com/nhl/player/gamelog/_/id/5084/jason-garrison
He's averaging more than 20 minutes a game. That's not 3rd pairing minutes. He's our #4 in terms of MPG, behind Hamhuis, Edler and Bieksa. Ballard and Tanev are still both seeing only 16-17 MPG.
Well, isn't it better that he was the "New Ballard" (since the LA Kings playoff series last season) vs the "Old Ballard" (pretty much most of the entire time before that as a Canuck)?You'd think we'd learn to stop brining in players from Florida but since Mike Gillis can only seem to get players from there we're stuck with guy number 3 that ''can't adjust'' and ''doesn't have the instict'' for our system.
I've been very disappointed with him and am horrified by the thought of 5 more years of this guy. He is the new Ballard.
Alright I got my final say. I think Garrison is doing well defensively and he can play the puck. But this is the problem we want him to score right? Well if you think of it he is not on the powerplay. He is like never set up for any shots or does not shoot. If Garrison could move in closer and get that rocket on net it can be very deadly and that's what the Canucks need to do.
Luongo for Gardiner and Kadri.
Kesler should have been moved to the wing with Hodgson in the middle.
Fire AV.
Otto kicked it in.
He's been good. It's a shame how the media built him up with all these unreasonable expectations in the offseason, and now they are hammering him for not living up to said expectations. He's had a little trouble getting up to speed just like everyone else on the blueline, and it's tougher as a defenceman joining a new team, you need to get used to the systems so you can react instinctively instead of thinking about it, and the lack of training camp complicates that. Garrison's done as well or better than my expectations, and I think will only get better.
Expectations for Garrison were way too high. Was suppose to come in and be a force on the power play. However, looked awkward and ineffective and was fairly quickly jettisoned off the power play and has not been used there since early in the season. Looks evident now that much of what he did in Florida offensively resulted from playing with a truly gifted player in Campbell.
I think it is becoming evident that Garrison is not a great skater. There is little smoothness to his play and he has to labour to make plays. I think this really shows up when he is forced to chase pucks dumped into his corner. He unable to turn fast enough or get to the puck quick enough to give himself space and time to make a play. Everything turns into a chase and puck battle in the corner. As a result the Canucks end up playing a lot in their own end when Garrison is out. I think this deficiency has been picked up by other teams and they try to exploit it.
The other problem here is that in order to try to provide himself time Garrison cheats a bit at the blueline and thus gives up the blue line line too easily.
Up to this point Garrison has been playing off his back heel and ends up mostly just trying to keep the puck to the outside and scramble the puck out of his end. He really cannot join the rush or get playing down hill in the middle ice or offensive end.
In the pre-season he had groin issues and that might explain some of the lack of mobility. However, could well be that Garrison is what he is - a pretty marginal NHL player.
I don't think anyone is making any final conclusions on Garrison but up to this point he has be a disappointment. As it is, looks like Tanev is being moved into the top 4 and Garrison to the last pairing.
he gets alot of unwarranted attention because he doesn't have the smooth mobility of hamhuis, the offensive flair of edler or the unpredictability of bieksa but imo he's been more consistent than any of the above mentioned defenders this year
just because he has an awkward skating style doesn't mean he's got poor footspeed or can't handle defenders one-on-one...i mean, ballard and hamhuis have excellent mobility but got embarrased last night with hawk players beating them one-on-one while garrison has shown very good positioning and stick checking ability
he needs more time to get comfortable and you can see that in how often he throws the puck along the boards in the defensive zone to nobody, although part of that is that he plays with bieksa and the support for the d from the forwards has been non-existent the past few games...he's also been playing against the opposition's top players while tanev and ballard, while playing above expectations, have been receiving the easier minutes
coaching staff needs to get him back on at least the 2nd unit pp and pair him with somebody more reliable than bieksa to get some more confidence...hearing his interview today, it sounded like he knows he's the new whipping boy and it's unclear how he'll respond to it mentally
Expectations for Garrison were way too high. Was suppose to come in and be a force on the power play. However, looked awkward and ineffective and was fairly quickly jettisoned off the power play and has not been used there since early in the season. Looks evident now that much of what he did in Florida offensively resulted from playing with a truly gifted player in Campbell.
I think it is becoming evident that Garrison is not a great skater. There is little smoothness to his play and he has to labour to make plays. I think this really shows up when he is forced to chase pucks dumped into his corner. He unable to turn fast enough or get to the puck quick enough to give himself space and time to make a play. Everything turns into a chase and puck battle in the corner. As a result the Canucks end up playing a lot in their own end when Garrison is out. I think this deficiency has been picked up by other teams and they try to exploit it.
The other problem here is that in order to try to provide himself time Garrison cheats a bit at the blueline and thus gives up the blue line line too easily.
Up to this point Garrison has been playing off his back heel and ends up mostly just trying to keep the puck to the outside and scramble the puck out of his end. He really cannot join the rush or get playing down hill in the middle ice or offensive end.
In the pre-season he had groin issues and that might explain some of the lack of mobility. However, could well be that Garrison is what he is - a pretty marginal NHL player.
I don't think anyone is making any final conclusions on Garrison but up to this point he has be a disappointment. As it is, looks like Tanev is being moved into the top 4 and Garrison to the last pairing.