Player Discussion Jake Virtanen (MOD WARNING POST 755)

Status
Not open for further replies.

4Twenty

Registered User
Dec 18, 2018
9,987
11,831
I'll take Bennett over Virtanen at this point, A) he plays down the middle and could replace the void of a 3rd line center that we currently don't have (sorry Sutter and Beagle) and B) Bennett just seems to have more of a drive than JV does, especially in the playoffs when it matters most. Give Bennett some PP opportunities and shuffle him up and down the line-up and there's a chance you'll find a player who's Top-6 material and can be called upon in most situations. I'll take that over a guy who's been given opportunity after opportunity and never taken the reigns as a legit Top-6 talent. Bennett has never really been given that chance in Calgary.
Are you related?
 

Pastor Of Muppetz

Registered User
Oct 1, 2017
26,180
16,066
I said he has played 26 professional playoff games.

10 in the AHL
+
16 in the NHL.
=
26 professional games.

I don’t fudge stats unlike some people.
So, you're adding the 10 AHL games, (after his WHL season). to exaggerate your point...To what extent did he play in those games?

He's played 16 NHL playoff games ..Bennetts played 30.
 

Szechwan

Registered User
Sep 13, 2006
5,761
5,296
Why do we want Bennett? He takes just as many dumb penalties as Jake, and doesn't have the defensive IQ to slot into the 3rd line C.
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
21,295
14,514
Why do we want Bennett? He takes just as many dumb penalties as Jake, and doesn't have the defensive IQ to slot into the 3rd line C.
If Craig Button's opinion means anything, the Flames would do a Bennett for Virtanen swap in a heartbeat. Virtanan is a far superior player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luckylarry

tantalum

Hope for the best. Expect the worst
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2002
25,127
13,973
Missouri
Since when has JV played in 26 playoff games.?.you joker...You also have to bring your game in the regular season as well, which Bennett has not..(I think you have a problem with your caps lock?)

OK then how about...Virtanen for his career is a 27 point/82 game pace and Bennett 28 point/82 game pace. Bennett with pretty even regular season performance and superior playoff performance.

But to be fair, you are correct the playoff stats for Virtanen are wrong. It's actually 4 points in 26 professional playoff games not 3.

Not a huge Bennett fan but I'd take him over Virtanen simply for lineup flexibility reasons. At this point, however, I'd prefer neither.
 

Royal Canuck

Taco Enthusiast
Feb 10, 2011
12,680
536
Victoria, BC
Why do we want Bennett? He takes just as many dumb penalties as Jake, and doesn't have the defensive IQ to slot into the 3rd line C.

It's a fresh start for both players, and I'd take a guy who can play up the middle and could possibly play the wing as well and is a much more consistent performer.

As I mentioned earlier, I'm not sure if Bennett has ever been given a fair shake in Calgary since he came in, whereas Jake has been given Top-6 opportunities time and time again and squandered them.

I think it could work out for both teams.
 

Pastor Of Muppetz

Registered User
Oct 1, 2017
26,180
16,066
OK then how about...Virtanen for his career is a 27 point/82 game pace and Bennett 28 point/82 game pace. Bennett with pretty even regular season performance and superior playoff performance.

But to be fair, you are correct the playoff stats for Virtanen are wrong. It's actually 4 points in 26 professional playoff games not 3.

Not a huge Bennett fan but I'd take him over Virtanen simply for lineup flexibility reasons.
No argument from me that Bennett has had better playoff stats (and he has played in twice as many), but his regular season stats have been regressing...Excluding this start to the season, Jakes have been improving.

From what I have been reading from Calgary fans, the guy is an empty sweater most nights.
 

Szechwan

Registered User
Sep 13, 2006
5,761
5,296
Meh, I see them both fizzling wherever they end up.

A motivated Jake is unpleasant to play against though, so I would rather ship him out East than have to see him in a Flames uni 8 times a year.

That team has enough Canucks.
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
22,165
14,083
It's a fresh start for both players, and I'd take a guy who can play up the middle and could possibly play the wing as well and is a much more consistent performer.

As I mentioned earlier, I'm not sure if Bennett has ever been given a fair shake in Calgary since he came in, whereas Jake has been given Top-6 opportunities time and time again and squandered them.

I think it could work out for both teams.
I’d be happy with Jake returning Bennett in trade too. But with Bennett not in the Flame’s lineup tonight, and Jake in ours I think Bennet is traded elsewhere. We are stuck with Jake, and for two more years unless we get a new GM.
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
21,295
14,514
It's a fresh start for both players, and I'd take a guy who can play up the middle and could possibly play the wing as well and is a much more consistent performer.

As I mentioned earlier, I'm not sure if Bennett has ever been given a fair shake in Calgary since he came in, whereas Jake has been given Top-6 opportunities time and time again and squandered them.

I think it could work out for both teams.
Then again, it could also work out as well as passing on Tofoli and letting him to sign with the Habs. I wouldn't want Virtanen anywhere near a division rival like Calgary. Trade him to the Eastern Conference and grab a d-man, which is a much more critical need.
 

Pastor Of Muppetz

Registered User
Oct 1, 2017
26,180
16,066
It's a fresh start for both players, and I'd take a guy who can play up the middle and could possibly play the wing as well and is a much more consistent performer.

As I mentioned earlier, I'm not sure if Bennett has ever been given a fair shake in Calgary since he came in, whereas Jake has been given Top-6 opportunities time and time again and squandered them.

I think it could work out for both teams.
Bennett has been given loads of of opportunities to play in Calgarys top 6.
 

Royal Canuck

Taco Enthusiast
Feb 10, 2011
12,680
536
Victoria, BC
It's funny, you look at how Josh Anderson on Montreal has turned his career around by refining his mindset and the way he attacks the game, and you look at Virtanen, who is basically Anderson with better wheels, and he just can't put it together.

Just goes to show how much matters between the ears.
 

Royal Canuck

Taco Enthusiast
Feb 10, 2011
12,680
536
Victoria, BC
Then again, it could also work out as well as passing on Tofoli and letting him to sign with the Habs. I wouldn't want Virtanen anywhere near a division rival like Calgary. Trade him to the Eastern Conference and grab a d-man, which is a much more critical need.

Only problem with that being that with COVID it would be two weeks before we could insert said D-men into the line-up.

I'm on board with bringing in another anchor on the right side.
 

tantalum

Hope for the best. Expect the worst
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2002
25,127
13,973
Missouri
No argument from me that Bennett has had better playoff stats (and he has played in twice as many), but his regular season stats have been regressing...Excluding this start to the season, Jakes have been improving.

From what I have been reading from Calgary fans, the guy is an empty sweater most nights.

They are very similar empty sweaters. Neither team should be concerned with moving them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkMM

tantalum

Hope for the best. Expect the worst
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2002
25,127
13,973
Missouri
It's funny, you look at how Josh Anderson on Montreal has turned his career around by refining his mindset and the way he attacks the game, and you look at Virtanen, who is basically Anderson with better wheels, and he just can't put it together.

Just goes to show how much matters between the ears.

Was it refining his mindset or simply a player who had a heck of a slump following a 27 goal season returning to form?
 
  • Like
Reactions: timw33

Royal Canuck

Taco Enthusiast
Feb 10, 2011
12,680
536
Victoria, BC
Was it refining his mindset or simply a player who had a heck of a slump following a 27 goal season returning to form?

That season was the first time he eclipsed 20 goals and still hasn't reached 50 points. Some could perceive that season to be what Jake experienced last year on a bigger scale.

From what I gathered when Columbus traded Anderson it was more than just a slump.
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
22,165
14,083
Willie D didn’t trust Jake.
Green doesn’t trust Jake.
Will Jake get a third coach here (or will that be elsewhere?) and will that coach not trust Jake?
 

RussianRacket

He/Him/His Pronouns
Dec 29, 2019
3,970
3,673
Coast Salish Unceded Territory
if he is going to salvage his career he will need to disappear somewhere like the Islanders or Panthers where there is no fanbase to hound after him.

Even then, career third liner if and only if everything falls perfectly in place for him from here on out.

Odds are, he's playing in Europe by 2022-2023 (imo).
 

Canucks1096

Registered User
Feb 13, 2016
5,608
1,667
I have been doing a long hard think about it.

Virtanen is one of the most unlikeable Canuck players in recent memory.

I actually think the opposite, Virtanen is one of most likeable players in recent memory. Reason because he is a local boy.

Over the years you had people saying next Bertuzzi/Neely, better than Ehlers/Nylander, he is built for the playoffs even Virtanen has never played well in the playoffs at any level. Virtanen never played like a power forward before or show any signs of being better than Ehlers/Nylander.

Only reason I can think is fans like Virtanen. If you like a player, that might actually influence your perception of that player and think he is better player that he really is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luckylarry

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
22,165
14,083
I actually think the opposite, Virtanen is one of most likeable players in recent memory. Reason because he is a local boy.

Over the years you had people saying next Bertuzzi/Neely, better than Ehlers/Nylander, he is built for the playoffs even Virtanen has never played well in the playoffs at any level. Virtanen never played like a power forward before or show any signs of being better than Ehlers/Nylander.

Only reason I can think is fans like Virtanen. If you like a player, that might actually influence your perception of that player and think he is better player that he really is.
Jake appears to be a likeable person, but he’s a terrible National League player.
 

RobertKron

Registered User
Sep 1, 2007
15,515
8,651
I actually think the opposite, Virtanen is one of most likeable players in recent memory. Reason because he is a local boy.

Over the years you had people saying next Bertuzzi/Neely, better than Ehlers/Nylander, he is built for the playoffs even Virtanen has never played well in the playoffs at any level. Virtanen never played like a power forward before or show any signs of being better than Ehlers/Nylander.

Only reason I can think is fans like Virtanen. If you like a player, that might actually influence your perception of that player and think he is better player that he really is.

most of the people who said that on here were just fans of Benning holding out hope that Virtanen would bring the great awakening.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad