Player Discussion Jake DeBrusk VIII

bme44

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 18, 2010
3,025
2,371
Nova Scotia
When it comes to Jake . I think the thing a lot of posters have been under estimating all year is his defensive play. The offense we all hope for from him has not been there for the most part this year. His compete level could have been better some nights for sure.
This year I do feel his defensive game has been his best ever.
 

Alicat

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 26, 2005
88,005
98,291
Boston
Jake is one of the most complete players on the team, a guy that shines in big games.

Need to find away to keep him or maybe they already have
When he's engaged and playing consistently, I agree but his lack of consistency needs to be addressed if he's going to remain in Boston. There is no reason why he can't play this way all season long.
 

goldenblack

Registered User
Apr 15, 2024
372
885
Why though, as we saw last year regular season means nothing.. I'll gladly take the guy who steps it up when it matters

Problem is it sets a horrible example from a core player. Who else will follow that lead?

It's so un-Bruins. But specially on a team that needs top 6 wing production because we're not amazing down the middle.
 

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
25,485
19,809
Maine
When he's engaged and playing consistently, I agree but his lack of consistency needs to be addressed if he's going to remain in Boston. There is no reason why he can't play this way all season long.

Maybe he's just not that dude. 20-25 goals in the regular season but turns it up for the post season I'm ok with. I think if he sticks around, expectations need to be adjusted of what to expect from him. But if that's the case, his salary needs to also be adjusted for this and that inconsistency should cost him on his contract.
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,090
20,868
Tyler, TX
Maybe he's just not that dude. 20-25 goals in the regular season but turns it up for the post season I'm ok with. I think if he sticks around, expectations need to be adjusted of what to expect from him. But if that's the case, his salary needs to also be adjusted for this and that inconsistency should cost him on his contract.

If he brings it with consistency in the playoffs, then he can be typical "here I am, there I go" Jake for the regular season. He's had three solid games vs the Leafs. Let's see if he can keep it up. If so, he should be back and get paid. Not the silly money some were suggesting at one point, but like a top 6 player who is not a superstar, all-star, or line-driver.
 

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
25,485
19,809
Maine
If he brings it with consistency in the playoffs, then he can be typical "here I am, there I go" Jake for the regular season. He's had three solid games vs the Leafs. Let's see if he can keep it up. If so, he should be back and get paid. Not the silly money some were suggesting at one point, but like a top 6 player who is not a superstar, all-star, or line-driver.

Reilly Smith is very similar with inconsistency from year to year, similar PPG ( .60 to .57 ) and has had a few good playoff runs where he's stepped up. He signed a multi year deal in 2022 at the age of 31 worth 5 mill per year.

Given Jake's age, the cap going up, and his current contract, I think he's going to fall in the 5.5-6 range if he's looking for fair market value.
 

CellyHard

Registered User
May 27, 2012
985
1,645
Massachusetts
It's aggravating to see just how good Debrusk can play. When he is on like this, you look foolish to stand on the side of letting him walk. When he goes through one of those cold spells during the regular season, you would be foolish advocating for him on a long-term deal.

At the end of the day, I don't think the Bruins can jeopardize losing a talent like him. Looking at the offenses of all these other playoff teams and they're at best somewhere in the middle of the pack. You have a 35 year old Marchand and maybe Lysell as a top six talent that can break in a year or two....theres not much else in the system
 

wintersej

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 26, 2011
22,223
17,113
North Andover, MA
It's aggravating to see just how good Debrusk can play. When he is on like this, you look foolish to stand on the side of letting him walk. When he goes through one of those cold spells during the regular season, you would be foolish advocating for him on a long-term deal.

At the end of the day, I don't think the Bruins can jeopardize losing a talent like him. Looking at the offenses of all these other playoff teams and they're at best somewhere in the middle of the pack. You have a 35 year old Marchand and maybe Lysell as a top six talent that can break in a year or two....theres not much else in the system

I mean if Jake Guentzel wants to come here and you need DeBrusk’s salary to do it, fine. But if you are gonna go grab a different 5 million dollar guy, rather the devil you know.
 

PatriceBergeronFan

Registered User
Jul 15, 2011
59,970
37,725
USA
Ironically for all the criticism Debrusk is the only forward to consistently perform in the playoffs. Forechecking, skating, hitting, board battles. Alone.

At this point I would not be surprised if he is the one who decides to move on rather than Boston.

When he's engaged and playing consistently, I agree but his lack of consistency needs to be addressed if he's going to remain in Boston. There is no reason why he can't play this way all season long.

Federic played around 15 games this season and won 7th player. Kessel used to go 15 games without scoring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mione134

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad