Value of: Jacob Trouba (Mod warning OP)

Status
Not open for further replies.

broc

Registered User
Dec 20, 2010
1,655
700
Don't understand.
These are solid assets.
DET is giving up mostly picks, entirely picks except for 1 stud prospect and a LD not worth his contract for short term cap dump if he gets off LTIR.

yes, the Detroit Red Wings- far and away the worst team in hockey this season- are going to trade not only an unprecedented gigantic package of quality draft picks... for players who couldnt help the Rangers be a good team. But they’ll also include their best prospect as well.

Logic fail here again, bern..
 

Pia8988

Registered User
May 26, 2014
14,375
8,796
yes, the Detroit Red Wings- far and away the worst team in hockey this season- are going to trade not only an unprecedented gigantic package of quality draft picks... for players who couldnt help the Rangers be a good team. But they’ll also include their best prospect as well.

Logic fail here again, bern..

How do you know it's a bern post? It has 17 different picks (Rangers get the higher ones) and normally the best prospect from the other team while giving 'expendable, but they're totally really good' NYR players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: go4hockey and broc

PullHard

Jul 18, 2007
28,401
2,478
I have no interest in that trade as a Wings fan, it flies in the face of everything our management is trying to accomplish right now
 

broc

Registered User
Dec 20, 2010
1,655
700
How do you know it's a bern post? It has 17 different picks (Rangers get the higher ones) and normally the best prospect from the other team while giving 'expendable, but they're totally really good' NYR players.

Also, are there guys from the NYR who need new contracts/nice raises, and/or players who need protection in the expansion draft (with none of these to go back to NYR in the offers)
Does it include somewhere a remark about “market price”? If so, we may be on to something...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pia8988

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
27,689
3,716
Da Big Apple
yes, the Detroit Red Wings- far and away the worst team in hockey this season- are going to trade not only an unprecedented gigantic package of quality draft picks... for players who couldnt help the Rangers be a good team. But they’ll also include their best prospect as well.

Logic fail here again, bern..

called out for BS.
players of the ilk you describe would be like Brendan Smith.
Was he in there? No.
You again ignore, and I will not allow you to get away with, refusing to admit that as noted, value is fair.
The core has a former 9OA and a guy who upon redraft would go at least 7OA for Seider, a reach at 6OA.
All the others, we are looking at first or second plus value for 2nds, including some in the future, for guys now, players who are early to mid 20s. In one fell swoop Wings got a complete core to add to what they have on W.

If your vote is to build via draft, slow and steady and hope to get it all right, fine.
But don't misrepresent the facts.


How do you know it's a bern post? It has 17 different picks (Rangers get the higher ones) and normally the best prospect from the other team while giving 'expendable, but they're totally really good' NYR players.
Facetious.
Guys who are good are dealt b'c replacements emerge happens often.
Deangelo -- not part of this deal -- will be usurped by Nils L. Who will ultimately be the better player? Remains to be seen. But NY needs to move on ADA so they have $ in 3 yrs when needed. Can move on now or later, but move on they will.

Again, value legit for all guys tendered in deal.


Also, are there guys from the NYR who need new contracts/nice raises, and/or players who need protection in the expansion draft (with none of these to go back to NYR in the offers)
Does it include somewhere a remark about “market price”? If so, we may be on to something...
Talk about having your cake and eating it too.
What unmitigated greed.
DET admits that it needs to add seriously to a threadbare roster.
This does it, without snookering any 30/ish guys not long term part of a build.

As explained. When you acquire talent, you have to pay for it, pay to keep it.
What these guys will earn will be market, adjusted for the fact it is a covid depressing economy driving their numbers down, something of which Wings should take advantage. Also, these are guys still on elc or rfa.

And you complain about paying their salaries?
Hypocrisy, man, H.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
27,689
3,716
Da Big Apple
In a world of uncertainty, I take comfort in the certainty that Trouba isn’t coming to Winnipeg!
You wanted him..... enjoy!

In the short term he controls, so it will be rangers or maybe he goes to DET for reasons specified earlier above.

No reunion at the 'peg
 

ICanMotteBelieveIt

Registered User
Jan 11, 2013
8,443
4,987
He's always been a bit overrated, but he's still a top pairing D IMHO. Without PP specialist DeAngelo Trouba would've had more points. Trouba's D partner has been trash and he's been getting all the tough minutes.

Put him with a decent D and he'll be even better.

Also his physicality is nice.

He'll be perfect as a partner to Miller when he's ready.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
36,110
22,064
Visit site
Easiest d core in the league to play against without him? Hfboards just doesn't grasp that physicality is part of hockey. He isnt going anywhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pld459666

SlapshotTheMovie

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
3,101
1,174
He is 2m over paid and has a full nmc. He isnt going anywhere. Tony D is the off man out. He isnt better then fox. he cant play his off side. He is too expensive for a third pair guy. Sucks. I would prefer tony but Trouba isn't being moved for a few more years if ever.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
27,689
3,716
Da Big Apple
He is 2m over paid and has a full nmc. He isnt going anywhere. Tony D is the off man out. He isnt better then fox. he cant play his off side. He is too expensive for a third pair guy. Sucks. I would prefer tony but Trouba isn't being moved for a few more years if ever.

Wrong x 2.
1. overpaid as to value approx 1.5m, not 2, and that is in large part due to covid economy which has negatively impacted worth of most contracts.
8 per was max of market value at that pre covid time.

2. He can be dealt w/o waiving, just not immediately. Per CF:
CLAUSE DETAILS: 2024-25: Player submits a 15 team no trade list; 2025-26: Player submits a 12 team no trade list.

Not likely he will waive soon, but if it is a place that works for him [DET] he may consider it since once the restriction is partially lifted we can deal him anywhere.
 

SlapshotTheMovie

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
3,101
1,174
Wrong x 2.
1. overpaid as to value approx 1.5m, not 2, and that is in large part due to covid economy which has negatively impacted worth of most contracts.
8 per was max of market value at that pre covid time.

2. He can be dealt w/o waiving, just not immediately. Per CF:
CLAUSE DETAILS: 2024-25: Player submits a 15 team no trade list; 2025-26: Player submits a 12 team no trade list.

Not likely he will waive soon, but if it is a place that works for him [DET] he may consider it since once the restriction is partially lifted we can deal him anywhere.
You think making that post to argue 500k makes you look like anything less then a clown? You f***ing clown. go away. I bet if some goes "yeah it was $3" you chime in like a total clown going "NO IT WAS $2.99"
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeonDraisaitl

Hockeyholic

Registered User
Apr 20, 2017
16,370
9,912
Condo My Dad Bought Me
He's a second pairing (At best) entitled defenceman making 8 million per season. He's not getting much back in a trade. Unless of course the Rangers want to send Kakko or another valuable asset back with him. I'm not even sure the Rangers are looking to trade him.
 

ThreeLeftSkates

Registered User
Nov 20, 2008
4,961
2,018
He's a second pairing (At best) entitled defenceman making 8 million per season. He's not getting much back in a trade. Unless of course the Rangers want to send Kakko or another valuable asset back with him. I'm not even sure the Rangers are looking to trade him.
But, every team in the NHL besides NYR needs him. You just don't understand how much better off you will be. Regret is a horrible thing.
 

ZiGOODejad

intangibles
Nov 30, 2013
5,371
1,563
they literally signed him to that contract because they want him as our 1D. They didn't sign him to that contract for no reason. He's not even bad, he just gets shitted on because he doesn't produce points like Tony or Fox. We don't need every defensemen we have to put up points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yuck

ZiGOODejad

intangibles
Nov 30, 2013
5,371
1,563
He's a second pairing (At best) entitled defenceman making 8 million per season. He's not getting much back in a trade. Unless of course the Rangers want to send Kakko or another valuable asset back with him. I'm not even sure the Rangers are looking to trade him.
thats certainly a hot take. kudos.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad