Jackets Woodchuck
Registered User
- Dec 27, 2010
- 4,163
- 292
Carlsson, Gavrikov, Kukan, Peeke, Siebenaler, Vainio, Ruopp, GravesI'm cool with it. My only concern is we have absolutely no defense prospects other than Carlsson and Gavrikov, and Gavrikov is a wild card. We need to stock up on some D prospects.
I'm cool with it. My only concern is we have absolutely no defense prospects other than Carlsson and Gavrikov, and Gavrikov is a wild card. We need to stock up on some D prospects.
Any chance this move sees Hannikainen return to Cleveland?
Carlsson, Gavrikov, Kukan, Peeke, Siebenaler, Vainio, Ruopp, Graves
Not a lot of top-end talent, but that's not necessary when you consider the ages of Werenski, Jones, Murray, and Savard.
We have the youngest team in the league and have a handful of prospects already, so yes I would have traded a bunch of picks for an elite power play guy that pushed Murray to the pressbox. In case you hadn't noticed, our power play has been garbage for the last month.
How can you say an 18 year old that was just drafted in the 2nd round doesn't have a possibility of being an every day NHLer? I mean, I'm not enamored with Peeke, but he's got the size and the tools necessary..The only two guys I think have a possibility of being everyday NHLers is Carlsson and Gavrikov. Maybe Peeke, but the jury is still out there. We'll see
Do I think we would have a slightly better chance winning the Stanley Cup with Shattenkirk on our team? Yes. Do I think the odds increase enough to be worth giving up very valuable assets for him? No. I'm guessing this is the root of where we're not seeing eye-to-eye.
Realistically, I should just refer you to the numerous comments about windows, depth, etc.
Carlsson, Gavrikov, Kukan, Peeke, Siebenaler, Vainio, Ruopp, Graves
Not a lot of top-end talent, but that's not necessary when you consider the ages of Werenski, Jones, Murray, and Savard.
I said the jury is still out. We'll see. He's got 3 years to go in college.How can you say an 18 year old that was just drafted in the 2nd round doesn't have a possibility of being an every day NHLer? I mean, I'm not enamored with Peeke, but he's got the size and the tools necessary..
while he still has a long, long way to go, Ryan Collins in Minnesota has been MUCH better this year, pretty solid.
Oh dear, how will Rimer keep him and Korpisalo straight?
Puke. Will he even get a contract?
Hannikainen is only in because Sedlak and Calvert are out. When they come back, Korpikoski isn't going to play.
Oh yeah one more concern. We have two Korpi nicknames. Who's Korpi?
please do not go there or I will be obliged to set you on fire. Development and depth do not have to be the same thing.This trade could indicate that lack of confidence they have in Milano...
He's in college, so it's still 3 more years at least. The Jackets lost Mike Reilly's rights 4 years after the draft.He's a junior, so still one more year. If he advances the same amount next year as he did this year, maybe. But he still needs work on his skating, a lot of work. But his instincts were tons better in the 3 games I saw.
Stars fan here- can anyone give me a brief overview on Heatherington? Thanks.
As far as Korpikoski goes, he's pretty speedy and a decent PK'er. Not going to blow anyone away with skill but he's a good upgrade for your 4th line.
please do not go there or I will be obliged to set you on fire. Development and depth do not have to be the same thing.
How can you say an 18 year old that was just drafted in the 2nd round doesn't have a possibility of being an every day NHLer? I mean, I'm not enamored with Peeke, but he's got the size and the tools necessary..
Your still doing that statement? Holy hell, get some new material.
How can you say an 18 year old that was just drafted in the 2nd round doesn't have a possibility of being an every day NHLer? I mean, I'm not enamored with Peeke, but he's got the size and the tools necessary..