ok it was a nice discussion. Very good comeback, obviously nothing better to say.
This is why I don't want to discuss it with you. It makes no difference what I say I'll have to listen to your lectures. I wasn't comparing the hits; yet you seem to be trying to get me to.
I'll just say that I don't agree with a lot of what you said. I've heard what you've had to say and I don't find it interesting or compelling. I don't find your overconfidence interesting or compelling either. To be honest, I have no idea why you are here. I don't come to your teams boards to discuss a player that received a suspension. It's just looks like stirring the pot. I doubt anyone here is interested in a league wide discussion on this. We're in a tough stretch and we were victims of the idiotic suspension on Wiz some time back. In other words, we have a chip on our shoulders. Your best bet is to just move on or discuss our team on a less dramatic topic.
So I ask you to not respond to me. I said all I wanted to say on this issue. History has always been a consideration. I didn't see head hunting by JJ. If you want to discuss the hit on AA, there is a thread for it. I would recommend everyone in here use it.
As far as trusting you, please. I've seen I think two posts from you. There is nothing in there to trust.
I've seen hits far worse than that get nothing. I'm not saying that it wasn't an illegal or dangerous hit. I can tell you, however, that JJ didn't intend to get the head and he certainly wasn't trying to hurt anyone. He has no history of this in the past and it should have been a consideration. The player wasn't injured, the officials didn't think it warranted 5 minutes (something that has been used in the past as a consideration). Frankly I don't see how anything beyond a game is warranted. If he did it again as a repeat offender, that looks like 5 games to me.
I've seen what you think so I have NO INTEREST in your rebuttal. Don't bother. You won't get a reply.
Thanks,