J. Lupul Appreciation thread

RyanOhReally

Registered User
Jan 21, 2015
2,368
1
Georgetown, ON
Waive him. Some team will pick him up for sure.

I think if he doesn't contribute to the team this year and can't be traded this deadline, he'll be either bought out or just sent to the Marlies for his remaining years. That's only if he's: 1) Injured constantly (possible) or 2) Mike Richards/Alex Semin bad (less likely).

I think Lupul has great leadership skills when he stops trying to fight fans over comments and he could also play well in Babcock's system. Did Lupul ever play for Babs on the Ducks?

Note: Yes, rookie season. Not a bad season for a 19-20 year old.
 

Darkside Blue

There/They're/Their
Feb 17, 2014
618
0
I think if he doesn't contribute to the team this year and can't be traded this deadline, he'll be either bought out or just sent to the Marlies for his remaining years. That's only if he's: 1) Injured constantly (possible) or 2) Mike Richards/Alex Semin bad (less likely).

I think Lupul has great leadership skills when he stops trying to fight fans over comments and he could also play well in Babcock's system. Did Lupul ever play for Babs on the Ducks?

He did indeed: http://www.torontosun.com/2015/05/23/lupul-happy-to-be-reunited-with-babcock
 

StevieBlunder

Registered User
Jun 17, 2015
325
0
I see no issues in having Lupul around for a while. As far as I'm concerned, he's not a must move like Bozak. We need some guys who've been around the block.

All I ask is for a lengthy season before an inevitable injury.
 

dballislife2

Registered User
Jul 7, 2011
1,437
0
if lupul plays healthy into the season, he can net a solid return...this is still a very good player when healthy that a lot of teams can use
 

Marmoset

Registered User
Apr 4, 2015
712
362
GTA
I think if he doesn't contribute to the team this year and can't be traded this deadline, he'll be either bought out or just sent to the Marlies for his remaining years. That's only if he's: 1) Injured constantly (possible) or 2) Mike Richards/Alex Semin bad (less likely).

A buyout doesn't make much sense. He has three years left and obviously two after this season. At that point unless he is total garbage I think he becomes someone you can trade. Plus, buying him out reduces the cap hit but that hit stays twice as long. We don't want to be paying him 4-5 years from now, we have done that with enough guys already.

If he's injured, we put him on IR until his contract is done. No big deal, we won't likely need the cap space for a while.

Ideally he stays healthy and plays well, which gives us a win-win situation - trade him for value, or keep as one of the vets to bridge the gap between the rebuild and (hopefully) contending.
 

Banic

Registered User
Jun 23, 2010
2,522
0
Toronto
I see no issues in having Lupul around for a while. As far as I'm concerned, he's not a must move like Bozak. We need some guys who've been around the block.

All I ask is for a lengthy season before an inevitable injury.

Even Bozak isn't a "must" move - unless of course you blame him for Kadri not getting 1st line minutes for w/e reason. He's a veteran player on a decent term moveable contract. If they don't get the package they want, they keep him. It's not like he's toxic in the dressing room.
 

Peace Frog

“Go on, say your thing man”
Jun 18, 2009
2,267
629
For some reason, I think Bozak might actually turn into a very good two way player under Babcock. Maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part? As far as Lupul goes, if he can find some way to not get injured, he will be a very helpful player for this squad, imo.
 

4thline

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
14,394
9,722
Waterloo
A buyout doesn't make much sense. He has three years left and obviously two after this season. At that point unless he is total garbage I think he becomes someone you can trade. Plus, buying him out reduces the cap hit but that hit stays twice as long. We don't want to be paying him 4-5 years from now, we have done that with enough guys already.

If he's injured, we put him on IR until his contract is done. No big deal, we won't likely need the cap space for a while.

Ideally he stays healthy and plays well, which gives us a win-win situation - trade him for value, or keep as one of the vets to bridge the gap between the rebuild and (hopefully) contending.

Completely agree, any kind of buyout/ sell low/ contract dump involving Lupul would probably be the first move by this management to make me unhappy. Unless there's some sort of major asset coming back, even if it is similarly risky (conditional pick, reclamation project, etc) I don't move Lupul. Given the rebuild and the pockets of this team there is no pressure to move him now, holding on and hoping for a rebound is the smart play when there is nothing to lose.

Plus I think its less of a gamble than one would think. I think Lupul's injury troubles are greatly exaggerated.

He's been in the NHL for 11 seasons.
In all but 2 of those he's played atleast 65% of his teams games. Those two being:
-his battle with back issues/ a blood infection
- getting hit with a dion clapper in the lockout shortened year
Both pretty rare circumstances

In all but 3 of those he's been above .6 ppg. Those three being:
-his rookie year
-the disastrous year in Edmonton
-the ****show that was 2014-2015 TML

He's both played in 65% of games been above .6ppg in 6/10 non rookie nhl seasons. Removing the two sub 65% seasons (which are borderline outliers statistically speaking)
his career season average is 41 points in 61 games.

I like the odds of a rebound, especially combined with the fact that with each passing year his contract becomes less of a barrier. Erik Cole and Kimmo TImonen got 2nds at this deadline, playoff teams be crazy.
 

SeaOfBlue

The Passion That Unites Us All
Aug 1, 2013
35,591
16,773
Even Bozak isn't a "must" move - unless of course you blame him for Kadri not getting 1st line minutes for w/e reason. He's a veteran player on a decent term moveable contract. If they don't get the package they want, they keep him. It's not like he's toxic in the dressing room.

Nobody is a must move, or else they'd be gone... Just like Devane, Biggs, Kessel, Ross, Ashton and Broll.

Those guys were must moves. Bozak will get what he deserves or won't get moved at all... Because if he's not moved, he's playing with JVR and Lupul on the top line (assuming both are here). Will it drop his offensive numbers? Probably. Will it drop them enough that his value should drop it? Probably not. In fact, he may still put up 40-45 points with those guys, and that may raise his value given people think he will only put up 30 points max without Kessel (and he just proved them wrong).
 

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
43,457
18,879
Toronto, ON
Nobody is a must move, or else they'd be gone... Just like Devane, Biggs, Kessel, Ross, Ashton and Broll.

Those guys were must moves. Bozak will get what he deserves or won't get moved at all... Because if he's not moved, he's playing with JVR and Lupul on the top line (assuming both are here). Will it drop his offensive numbers? Probably. Will it drop them enough that his value should drop it? Probably not. In fact, he may still put up 40-45 points with those guys, and that may raise his value given people think he will only put up 30 points max without Kessel (and he just proved them wrong).

Why should he play on the top line? Kadri should play there. This is BS. If I have to endure one more year where Bozak gets first line minutes, I don't know. It's another waste of a season if Kadri is not getting first line minutes.
 

LV*

Free my bro Leivo
Aug 26, 2012
11,559
10
Toronto
Lupul will remain as a vet 100%, why do people think we need to trade him? We're not gonna get anything for him, so might as well let him play as a veteran in our top 6. We don't need the capspace lol.

He's not a bad player offensively.
 

stymie

Registered User
Oct 15, 2014
920
131
I would appreciate it if Lupul retires.
He makes $5.25M and has a career 40% dressed.
Save his mug & noodle for stardom.
Only a cap floor team would touch him.
 

4thline

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
14,394
9,722
Waterloo
I would appreciate it if Lupul retires.
He makes $5.25M and has a career 40% dressed.
Save his mug & noodle for stardom.
Only a cap floor team would touch him.

If I'm understanding you that is actually very incorrect. He's dressed for 75% of games over his career, and only been under 65% twice.
 

Zybalto

Registered User
Dec 28, 2012
9,561
8,920
I remember this well....



Thats not the same guy we saw in 2015. He's hurting.
 

RyanOhReally

Registered User
Jan 21, 2015
2,368
1
Georgetown, ON
A buyout doesn't make much sense. He has three years left and obviously two after this season. At that point unless he is total garbage I think he becomes someone you can trade. Plus, buying him out reduces the cap hit but that hit stays twice as long. We don't want to be paying him 4-5 years from now, we have done that with enough guys already.

If he's injured, we put him on IR until his contract is done. No big deal, we won't likely need the cap space for a while.

Ideally he stays healthy and plays well, which gives us a win-win situation - trade him for value, or keep as one of the vets to bridge the gap between the rebuild and (hopefully) contending.

Completely agree, any kind of buyout/ sell low/ contract dump involving Lupul would probably be the first move by this management to make me unhappy. Unless there's some sort of major asset coming back, even if it is similarly risky (conditional pick, reclamation project, etc) I don't move Lupul. Given the rebuild and the pockets of this team there is no pressure to move him now, holding on and hoping for a rebound is the smart play when there is nothing to lose.

Plus I think its less of a gamble than one would think. I think Lupul's injury troubles are greatly exaggerated.

He's been in the NHL for 11 seasons.
In all but 2 of those he's played atleast 65% of his teams games. Those two being:
-his battle with back issues/ a blood infection
- getting hit with a dion clapper in the lockout shortened year
Both pretty rare circumstances

In all but 3 of those he's been above .6 ppg. Those three being:
-his rookie year
-the disastrous year in Edmonton
-the ****show that was 2014-2015 TML

He's both played in 65% of games been above .6ppg in 6/10 non rookie nhl seasons. Removing the two sub 65% seasons (which are borderline outliers statistically speaking)
his career season average is 41 points in 61 games.

I like the odds of a rebound, especially combined with the fact that with each passing year his contract becomes less of a barrier. Erik Cole and Kimmo TImonen got 2nds at this deadline, playoff teams be crazy.

I don't think you guys interpreted my post correctly.

I said if he does not perform, WHATSOEVER, then there are 2 possibilities that will occur with the Lupul.

1) He is sent down to the Marlies, either next season or the after, and used as a guide/mentor for the younger generation coming up. He'll be relatively forgotten about (Unless picked up off waivers) and would remain there barring some statistical spike that shows he may have retained his old form.

2) He is bought out. This is in the case of a Mike Richards/Alex Semin scenario, where he is so bad and so toxic (While he does possess great leadership skills, see 1., he also can do some stupid things) that he should not be remotely on the roster. Now he is different to Semin and Richards in that after this season, a season that he will play here, he has only 2 years left. So that does make this lesser option as he would then be on the books for twice as long, but a much smaller cap hit. Worth noting that with the youth of this team being what it is for the remaining of his contract, his original cap hit is a non issue.

Now, this is all under the premise that he does not perform this season. If he, alongside guys like Kadri, JVR, Rielly, Phaneuf, etc. is able to make this team dramatically better, then he could be held onto. In this case he'd be used as a cushion for the younger players, being able to absorb the attention when Nylander, Brown, Kapanen and Marner are brought up. Something along the lines of his 2011-2012 season would make this a reality.

But if he gets something more reasonable, like an improved 50-pt season, then he is with out a doubt "Trade Bait". He'll be shipped out sometime between January and the TDL and will fetch a 1st and a prospect (An obvious over payment but all trades of this nature are). Most fans are hoping for this scenario, because it attributes to the rebuild that we have going.

Now personally, I don't know what I'd like. Would it be great to see Joffrey Lupul reign supreme in Toronto again? Of course. Would I like that to happen at the expense of a Jakob Chychrun? Not really. But there's also a whole bunch more top players in this draft that could be available from 5-10.

I think we need to realize what Joffrey is. A remarkably injury-prone player, who when playing at the top of his game, is an elite, and yet underrated, 2-way player with a bit grit to his game. He's a smooth skater, with great hands and lots of hockey IQ. Remember that he was considered our franchise guy during that 2011-2012 season. He was named Alternate Captain at the All-Star game, and was a key piece to our future. Even the following season, the lockout year, he dominated before and after being injured. But his play, along with the team, went down hill. So it is easy to think that a coach like Babcock, someone who only I've just recently discovered coached Lupul in '03-'04*, can easily bring him back to elite level status.

*I actually have his Ducks rookie card. I won it in a special pack that I got in the mail when I was 8-9 years old. It came with the "Top Prospects" of that time. Guys like Eric Staal, MA Fleury, Braydon Coburn, Andrew Alberts and Jussi Jokinen were all in it. Was really cool back then.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad