Agreed. Hasn't looked like he's ready.
Interesting. You certainly loved the idea of him as captain this summer. What has changed your mind?
Agreed. Hasn't looked like he's ready.
Seguin had Bergeron, Chara, Krecji etc.
Duchene, Mackinnon, Landeskog have/had Tanguay and Hejduk
Stamkos had Lecavalier and St. Louis.
Hall, Ebs, Yak, Schultz, RNH have Horc lol.
Not one forward or D that have experience in being a star player in the NHL that can give tutelage to the kids. They're out on their own out there.
To which I ask "Where has Ales Hemsky been over these past several years?"
I'd be really curious as to what kind of tutelage he's been providing the young, offensively talented forwards since this rebuild started. I've heard often over the years about how he's been the lone shining light in a lot of dark times, you'd think that he'd only be too happy to help out the younglings.
Or not?
To which I ask "Where has Ales Hemsky been over these past several years?"
I'd be really curious as to what kind of tutelage he's been providing the young, offensively talented forwards since this rebuild started. I've heard often over the years about how he's been the lone shining light in a lot of dark times, you'd think that he'd only be too happy to help out the younglings.
Or not?
To which I ask "Where has Ales Hemsky been over these past several years?"
I'd be really curious as to what kind of tutelage he's been providing the young, offensively talented forwards since this rebuild started. I've heard often over the years about how he's been the lone shining light in a lot of dark times, you'd think that he'd only be too happy to help out the younglings.
Or not?
Knowing Hall, he wouldnt ever throw someone under the bus in public...he also wouldnt say anything for the sake of lip service. the guy speaks his mind and values his opinion. if he had something bad to say he would choose not talk.
To which I ask "Where has Ales Hemsky been over these past several years?"
I'd be really curious as to what kind of tutelage he's been providing the young, offensively talented forwards since this rebuild started. I've heard often over the years about how he's been the lone shining light in a lot of dark times, you'd think that he'd only be too happy to help out the younglings.
Or not?
I don't buy it anymore. In a leadership vacuum one of the young players needs to step up. They haven't. Tavares, Landeskog, Toews, Crosby and Subban have all stepped up and taken significant leadership roles early in their careers.
Sure, bring in a veteran or two.....But what this signals to me is that the core group of players we are trying to build around aren't leaders. That is a major issue that isn't going to rectified by bringing in a veteran. Your best players need to be intrinsically motivated.
So what is Hall trying to say? For me that sounds that he wants to trade some young player for veterans. Could it be... Yakupov?
Maybe they can bring him back in a management capacity as "senior player liaison" whose main job would be to crack heads in the locker room.
Seguin had Bergeron, Chara, Krecji etc.
Duchene, Mackinnon, Landeskog have/had Tanguay and Hejduk
Stamkos had Lecavalier and St. Louis.
Hall, Ebs, Yak, Schultz, RNH have Horc lol.
Not one forward or D that have experience in being a star player in the NHL that can give tutelage to the kids. They're out on their own out there.
Perfectly put. And you can tell that Hall is getting sick of it.
Yeah I agree. The Pens and Hawks didn't "baby" their core with a ton of veterans either, despite how people like to revise the situation as.
Crosby/Toews naturally embraced that role even early in their careers, Tavares does just fine in New York leading the Islanders night in, night out also.
This team needs a guy who'll actually go battle in the corners and fish a puck out for the "kids" more than a locker room hero IMO.
Those teams were/are full of veterans, especially Pittsburg/Chicago who both made a point of going out and signing older successful players so the younger guys wouldn't be fed to the wolves.
The experience levels of those teams allowed the younger guys to step into leadership roles at a younger age. The Islanders especially expose how poor the Oilers are, they are an example that you can fill a team full of affordable vets who will fill roles without complaint, something the Oilers have failed spectacularly at.
I think this is really over blown. Crosby was thrown to the wolves. So were Toews and Kane. So was Tavares.
The truth is they were good enough to deal with that and the main difference is not the veteran difference, but the fact that their rosters weren't as woefully imbalanced as the Oilers is.
This team needs some puck retreival, not a motivational speech in the locker room, that doesn't do much when the other team is pinning your in your own zone for 5 minutes until you cry daddy.
Horcoff, Smyth, Ference, are all good guys who have been through the battles, and Krueger was a motivational speaker ... that sorta thing only gets you certain results. You need players to perform on the ice.
This team is not an Alex Tanguay in the locker room away from the playoffs.
Pittsburg went and signed Gonchar, Reechi, Leclair, traded for Gary Roberts, Guerin, Hossa and a host of other vets. Mario Lemieux even came out of retirement for a year to help Crosby along.
Chicago signed players like Campbell, Hossa, and always had a ton of strong vet types lower down the roster.
Islanders specifically brought in players like Weight, Streit, Witt, Visnovsky and whatever other cheap, at the end of the line veteran they could find who could help the team along.
The only myth is that Tavares, Kane/Toews, and Crosby/Malkin were thrown to the wolves. The Oiler draft picks were thrown to the wolves, and just going through the rosters year by year of other rebuilds is an easy example of how incredibly inept and poorly run the Oilers organization is.
This is true - however, I think the Blackhawks also expected more from Kane and Toews at an earlier stage. Guys like Gagner, Eberle, and Hall are still being described as "kids" even though they've all been in the NHL for a while and aren't really being held accountable by anyone for the team's lack of success. After Toews' rookie year (or, by the time he was at Yakupov's stage) he was already team captain. And by the time Kane/Toews were at the same stage as Hall is, they had already won the Stanley Cup (with Toews being the Conn Smyth winner). Having a better leadership core definitely helped - but the players were helped by the fact the organization was way better functioning (and there was also better coaching in place). Incidentally, one of the reasons that the Hawks fired Savard and hired Quenneville is because it was determined that they needed someone more experience to get them to the next level. I know Eakins has a lot of time left on his contract, but the Oilers should still consider getting someone who knows what he's doing at the NHL level - like Laviolette.
Toews was a bit of a freak when you get down to it, he's a guy who stepped into the NHL and was nicknamed Captain Serious shortly after. It's unreasonable to suggest that a unique player is somehow the standard for which other rebuild franchise players should be judged.
By contrast, Crosby's first year in the league was full of on ice distractions as he whined about every play on the ice, to the point his own teammates could be seen rolling their eyes as "crybaby Crosby" would throw another one of his fits at the refs.
You're absolutely right about the coaching though. Renny clearly bought into the "young vs old" mentality that divided the locker room early, Kreuger wasn't given a chance, and Eakins has bombed spectacularly, this team needs a veteran leader coach in very bad way.