Whoever playing similar needs to win 4 (FOUR) Stanley Cups to even be worth mentioned in same breath as Homer.
Homer was obviously most known for his net front ability, and rightfully squickeven Don Cherry called him one of the 5 best he's ever seen at it, but his ability to win puck battles in the corners and protect the puck long enough to find the open man really allowed him to be successful for so long. He was a great puck retrieval player and that's pretty remarkable when you consider how poor of a skater he was. Homer was a offensive zone specialist. Unique player for sure. Hornquist has always been a player who has gotten compared to him.
For some reason Gallagher...
Homer was definitely slow in open ice, but I think his first step and choppy strides were actually quite quick. Combined with top notch reflexes, he could get from from the crease to the corner with the best of em. That is a good part of why he remained competitive for so long.
Johan Franzen. At least he used to score all of his goals by deflections or in front of the net.
Franzen has always done the bulk of his scoring with his wrist shot out high. I know it is fun to tear him apart at every opportunity but he isn't this guy. He isn't terrible at it, but it is an unfair expectation of everyone that he should just be doing it.
Agree with Hornqvist being brought up, probably the closest but still pretty far behind in terms of how good Holmstrom was.