Iggys Dome
Not allowed to say the “R-Word” (rebuild)
Simple question. If he was on another team, can he be the the centre piece to build around akin to McDavid, Matthews, Mackinnon etc.?
Yep.
McDavid - Crosby - Ovechkin - Bourque = Generational
Drai - Mackinnon - Malkin - Matthews - Erik Karlsson = Franchise
McDavid - Crosby - Ovechkin = Generational
Would Gretzky, Lemiuex, Orr, Howe Be transcendent talents? Also where would you fit in Jagr
No, because a team can only have one franchise player. EA Sports has screwed up the definition of franchise player for sure. It used to be that a franchise player was any star level player that a team is built around. The face of the organization. Now it is a marker as to how good a player is, but that's a flawed metric. If Leon played for nearly any team other than the Oilers, he would be a Franchise Player, but McDavid is the Oilers Franchise Player, so Draisaitl can't be at that same level.
I can't see how those three would represent three different generations.
I think I'd be pretty biased to not consider him generational.
TBH I wanted to see more out of him after he left Mario's side, but he was still a beast and he didn't have a lot to play with in Washington and New York.
I wouldn't bother debating anyone who considers him generational.
Was Mario not generational talent?I can't see how those three would represent three different generations.
Was Mario not generational talent?
They are supposedly the faces of their respective franchise/organization. There should be 30-50 of these in theory.Side question, who are the franchise players in the league?
To me, this is a very different question from just "name the top ~10 players" because it's a lot easier to be a franchise player as Center or Goaltender than as a Winger or Defenseman.
In no order, based on the past two seasons:
Vasilevsky, Kucherov, Hedman, Barkov, Kane, Matthews, McDavid, Draisaitl, Crosby, Panarin, MacKinnon, Kopitar
Kane and Eichel sure but the other ones would be a no for me. Franchise needs to be a player that an entire team can be built around and can be the #1 guy on a cup contender.They are supposedly the faces of their respective franchise/organization. There should be 30-50 of these in theory.
Tkachuk x 2, Aho, Barzal, Eichel, Kane, Seth Jones etc are all franchise players to me.
yeah i 2nd this. just because they are a franchises best player, doesnt mean they are universally a franchise player.Kane and Eichel sure but the other ones would be a no for me. Franchise needs to be a player that an entire team can be built around and can be the #1 guy on a cup contender.
Are you really going to win the cup if Barzal or Matthew Tkachuk are your best players?
I was surprised seeing you there I was like : Hmmm maybe he knows something we don'tmy mouse jumped and I hit no... but yes, he is.