raus
Registered User
- May 7, 2014
- 13
- 0
Last season teams such as Amur and Minsk might have been weaker than Kärpät and Tappara, but a big majority of the KHL teams are better than any Liiga team.Well, it is true that some teams in the KHL are high level but there are also teams that are weaker than some of the Finnish teams
No, the level of play in the KHL is just a lot better than it is in Liiga. You only need to watch the games to see the difference.- so you could argue that the level of play is more or less the same.
Well, it is true that some teams in the KHL are high level but there are also teams that are weaker than some of the Finnish teams - so you could argue that the level of play is more or less the same.
The best teams in the KHL are a lot better than any team in Liiga.The better teams are slightly better in KHL, that's true.
Easily? Is Kärpät a better team than Avangard who did not advance to playoffs last season?Kärpät would easily have clinched a playoff spot in the KHL if they had played last year.
The difference is much smaller than you think. No way in hell Metallurg Novokuznetsk would win SM-Liiga.
The better teams are slightly better in KHL, that's true. But you guys put to much faith into the KHL teams. Kärpät would easily have clinched a playoff spot in the KHL if they had played last year. The difference is much smaller than you think. No way in hell Metallurg Novokuznetsk would win SM-Liiga.
The difference is much smaller than you think. No way in hell Metallurg Novokuznetsk would win SM-Liiga.
And you have to consider the size of the two leagues. Liiga has 14 teams and the KHL will have 29-30 teams next season.Metallurg Novokuznetsk? The fact that you comparing one of the worst teams in KHL with best teams in Liiga, said everything.
Metallurg Novokuznetsk? The fact that you comparing one of the worst teams in KHL with best teams in Liiga, said everything.
If you read closely "Peter" said Novokuznetsk is better than Kärpät, which I said they are not. The difference between top KHL teams and bottom NHL teams is very small, in the same way the best teams in SM-Liiga is almost as good as the best teams in KHL. Salavat Yulaev, a top team in the KHL, would compete for gold in SM-Liiga but is not a certain winner.
That's just not true, now more than ever. Liiga is weaker than it has ever been and the difference between it and KHL at this point really is considerable.
If you compare the level of play in KHL finals between Metallurg and Lev and Liiga finals between Kärpät and Tappara the difference of skill, speed, tempo and even physical play was noticeable.
How many Lüga games did you watch this past season and via what source?
You should watch some more games. Playoffs particular. Even when Robidas played in SM-liiga during the lockout he was amazed how physical the league is...lots of physical battles and I don't mean fights. Even this year's playoffs were jokingly called "wrestling hockey" cause the refs let the players have too much freedom.If you compare the level of play in KHL finals between Metallurg and Lev and Liiga finals between Kärpät and Tappara the difference of skill, speed, tempo and even physical play was noticeable.
Jokerit Helsinki 2014/2015 season talk - thread has 46,722 views already
Something like "Composition of Jokerit team", so basically the same.It went under a different name previously.
A few worst teams in the KHL (Amur, Novokuznetsk, Vityaz, Minsk in last season, probably Sochi) are about the same level as most of Liiga teams.