ThatSaid
Registered User
Hello all! Thought I'd take some time as a guy who tries to see every game to give my initial impressions of the team this year. I know its early, but I think it would be interesting to see how everyone else is feeling about the team. I'll start.
The Good:
Corey Crawford has really kept us in games. Its not really surprising, but I think if he wasn't playing at his current level, our record would look a lot different. He seems much calmer in the crease, and his athleticism has really been on display. Everything just looks so sharp. Wondering what he might have been playing with last year in the way of injuries, because its been a while since I've seen him moving like that.
Team defense, overall, has been far better than I expected. Its obvious the scouting team did a really good job finding players who fit Q's system, and can quickly adapt to the 200 foot game that he requires. I've been really impressed.
That second line....its killer. Don't really need to say much about that!
The Bad:
There haven't been many games where our first line looks dangerous. Kaner's line is obviously firing on all cylinders, and Toews' line has been as shutdown as it ever is, but I'd like to see some more production (at least in the way of quality chances) by our #1 line. Its pretty clear that we have a hole to fill on the left side, and I'm not sure who can fill that. I'll touch on this more later.
The transition game has been a lot sloppier than in years past. I chalk this up mainly to the inexperience of our young blue-liners, and Daley's unfamiliarity with the system. It seems like either the D-men are hesitant to move the puck up, and the passing lanes close, or they fire the pass too fast, and miss. I guess that comes with more ice time, something that will come in bunches while Keith is out. I also think the aggressive backcheck that Q requires is gumming that up a bit for some of the new acquisitions who aren't used to starting from so deep in their own zone. I think this will get sorted out with more time.
Toews and Hossa need Panarin more than Kane does. This is going to be really controversial, because as we all know, the Kane line is the only one producing. Panarin has been an absolute revelation, but Kaner and Panarin are both elite perimeter players, and while Toews and Hossa are certainly capable of wheeling the puck around the point, its not what they do best. That line needs an outlet, who doesn't backcheck as deep, and that can create their own space while they wait for Hossa and Toews to leg it out. Panarin seems like the perfect fit. I think we also need to consider how great AA has been on that second line. His play doesn't get highlighted nearly enough. That second line will be fine with Kaner and AA as the anchors.
What say you?
The Good:
Corey Crawford has really kept us in games. Its not really surprising, but I think if he wasn't playing at his current level, our record would look a lot different. He seems much calmer in the crease, and his athleticism has really been on display. Everything just looks so sharp. Wondering what he might have been playing with last year in the way of injuries, because its been a while since I've seen him moving like that.
Team defense, overall, has been far better than I expected. Its obvious the scouting team did a really good job finding players who fit Q's system, and can quickly adapt to the 200 foot game that he requires. I've been really impressed.
That second line....its killer. Don't really need to say much about that!
The Bad:
There haven't been many games where our first line looks dangerous. Kaner's line is obviously firing on all cylinders, and Toews' line has been as shutdown as it ever is, but I'd like to see some more production (at least in the way of quality chances) by our #1 line. Its pretty clear that we have a hole to fill on the left side, and I'm not sure who can fill that. I'll touch on this more later.
The transition game has been a lot sloppier than in years past. I chalk this up mainly to the inexperience of our young blue-liners, and Daley's unfamiliarity with the system. It seems like either the D-men are hesitant to move the puck up, and the passing lanes close, or they fire the pass too fast, and miss. I guess that comes with more ice time, something that will come in bunches while Keith is out. I also think the aggressive backcheck that Q requires is gumming that up a bit for some of the new acquisitions who aren't used to starting from so deep in their own zone. I think this will get sorted out with more time.
Toews and Hossa need Panarin more than Kane does. This is going to be really controversial, because as we all know, the Kane line is the only one producing. Panarin has been an absolute revelation, but Kaner and Panarin are both elite perimeter players, and while Toews and Hossa are certainly capable of wheeling the puck around the point, its not what they do best. That line needs an outlet, who doesn't backcheck as deep, and that can create their own space while they wait for Hossa and Toews to leg it out. Panarin seems like the perfect fit. I think we also need to consider how great AA has been on that second line. His play doesn't get highlighted nearly enough. That second line will be fine with Kaner and AA as the anchors.
What say you?