Post-Game Talk: In Soviet Ottawa, Goals Score You! Sens 6 Habs 3

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
95,822
60,213
Ottawa, ON
I think it's pretty clear that Montreal had an off-night. Some of those mistakes were pretty uncharacteristic.

Blaming Price for the goal where Dadonov received a pass from Anisimov behind the net and basically one-timed it past the goalie with no defensive coverage whatsoever is pretty typical though.

Price doesn't seem to be great all the time against us, but I don't think Allen would have fared any better with the quality of some of those chances. Price made some pretty big stops to keep it close from time to time as well.

In any event, Toffoli and Anderson showed up and it was still almost enough.

The shots weren't necessarily flattering to Ottawa but the Habs spent more time on the PP in general and at some pretty key times in the game.

I think what the Montreal media and some fans struggled to understand in some of the pre-game coverage I listened to was that Ottawa had played one of its worst games since that horrendous start of the season in our match-up earlier this week. Maybe the Montreal players got caught napping as well because of how easy that game went.

Ultimately it was sort of an expected result with each team mailing it in for one of the games.
 
Last edited:

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
42,453
16,073
Gud got beat wide by Gallagher at one point in very traditional fashion but it didn't cost us.

Coburn cost us a PP goal with a penalty (make-up call?).

If the result were different, you might see the typical reaction.

In general though, I do agree with the general premise that fans spend a lot of time pointing fingers at 4th liners and 3rd pairing defencemen when they don't have the most significant impact on the final result of the game.

Gudbranson bothered me a lot more when he was playing a lot more minutes and with much better partners.
I find brown gets beat a little less than gudbranson
 
  • Like
Reactions: NyQuil

Big Muddy

Registered User
Dec 15, 2019
8,642
4,115
I find brown gets beat a little less than gudbranson

I'm going to try and pay a little more attention to the play of all of our d-men in the next few games.

I was watching Gudbranson closely last night. When Montreal was on the rush, they frequently got behind him pretty quickly. He would realize he was getting beat and would pivot and turn (from skating backwards) and would get even further behind (& tripped once). He's good on the boards and clears the front of the net, and sticks up for his team mates, but skating and foot speed are an issue for him. He's a character guy, but if they decide to get a veteran defender as a stop gap again next year, hopefully they will find someone better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy

Bileur

Registered User
Jun 15, 2004
18,533
7,276
Ottawa
I was watching Gudbranson closely last night. When Montreal was on the rush, they frequently got behind him pretty quickly. He would realize he was getting beat and would pivot and turn (from skating backwards) and would get even further behind (& tripped once). He's good on the boards and clears the front of the net, and sticks up for his team mates, but skating and foot speed are an issue for him. He's a character guy, but if they decide to get a veteran defender as a stop gap again next year, hopefully they will find someone better.

The odd thing on the rush is that he doesn’t seem to change his angles to adjust to various oncoming forwards. Seems to always have a gap too big for him to close with his poor skating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alf Silfversson

Big Muddy

Registered User
Dec 15, 2019
8,642
4,115
The odd thing on the rush is that he doesn’t seem to change his angles to adjust to various oncoming forwards. Seems to always have a gap too big for him to close with his poor skating.
Ya, I was going to write about bad angles as well, but stopped short of that (kept the post shorter).
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
53,863
31,086
I'm going to try and pay a little more attention to the play of all of our d-men in the next few games.
Brown is a much better skater imo, but Gudbranson is more physical and seems to make better reads. When Gud gets beat it for some reason seems more obvious but I'm not so sure he gets beat more often. Worth keeping an eye out for it.
 

Chabot84

Registered User
Oct 24, 2009
1,841
737
That was a big win. Too bad we couldn’t win both games against MTL. Hopefully the boys will be fired up now. Pretty tough stretch here with the next 6 games against WPG, EDM and TOR.
 

Chabot84

Registered User
Oct 24, 2009
1,841
737


I really have a feeling MTL isn’t a lock for the playoffs. They are being propped up by OT losses and have a tougher schedule moving forward. They can’t be dropping points to Ottawa. Obviously Vancouver is a huge question mark right now with their situation. They would be my pick over Calgary under normal circumstances here.

If Ottawa could do some damage over the next 6 games against WPG, TOR and EDM (unlikely) the standings could start looking a lot different in a short amount of time.

as their next seven games would be against MTL, Calgary and Vancouver*

followed by another 2 games against MTL.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AchtzehnBaby

albator71

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
4,609
2,472
CANADA
Wouldn't you rather see optimistic posts than negative ones for a change, or do people on here live just to shit on the team & management & hope they are bad every game to prove they know better.
Bingo! thats exactly what it is. Every damn time we win a game its because they other team had an off night, its never because we were the better team that night! It's getting exhausting, that I dont come here as often as I use too.
 

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
95,822
60,213
Ottawa, ON
Every damn time we win a game its because they other team had an off night, its never because we were the better team that night!

It's usually some combination of both.

For what it's worth, I thought -we- had an off-night in our loss against the Habs earlier this week after that second goal early in the 2nd. 1st period was pretty decent.

I mean, isn't that being positive about a loss?
 

aragorn

Do The Right Thing
Aug 8, 2004
28,608
9,124
I was watching Gudbranson closely last night. When Montreal was on the rush, they frequently got behind him pretty quickly. He would realize he was getting beat and would pivot and turn (from skating backwards) and would get even further behind (& tripped once). He's good on the boards and clears the front of the net, and sticks up for his team mates, but skating and foot speed are an issue for him. He's a character guy, but if they decide to get a veteran defender as a stop gap again next year, hopefully they will find someone better.

Wait until you see J. Brown on a regular basis next yr & then we can see how people feel about him. He has another yr on his contract so I imagine he will be in the lineup to start the yr, but I doubt that will last very long. This team needs the young guys to mature quickly & I'm not sure they have enough depth on defence to do much better than this yr unless they add a couple of UFA defencemen. The guys available & that would come here for only a yr are not going to be that much better than what we have now IMO, we'll see of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cosmix

Big Muddy

Registered User
Dec 15, 2019
8,642
4,115
Wait until you see J. Brown on a regular basis next yr & then we can see how people feel about him. He has another yr on his contract so I imagine he will be in the lineup to start the yr, but I doubt that will last very long. This team needs the young guys to mature quickly & I'm not sure they have enough depth on defence to do much better than this yr unless they add a couple of UFA defencemen. The guys available & that would come here for only a yr are not going to be that much better than what we have now IMO, we'll see of course.

I'm hoping we don't see Josh Brown on a regular basis next year actually. I'd put Brown & Gudbranson in the same boat.

No idea what Ottawa will do this offseason to address the blueline next year. Their young prospects are the future no doubt, but I can see where a stop gap could be necessary in the meantime.

You are right in that one-year contracts aren't going to motivate the better free agent defenders that are typically available (in a typical year). The last offseason I would say was an outlier or exception though given the league-wide COVID economics. Not sure how quickly most owners will start spending again given that revenue has been significantly reduced over the last 2 years. So, maybe that provides some more potential upside for the Senators again.

They might have to bite the bullet and offer a longer (versus a "long") contract.
 
Last edited:

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
53,863
31,086
Bingo! thats exactly what it is. Every damn time we win a game its because they other team had an off night, its never because we were the better team that night! It's getting exhausting, that I dont come here as often as I use too.

Isn't them having an off night and us winning as a result basically a subset of us being the better team that night?

I feel like in the Venn diagram of reasons for us winning, there'd be a lot of overlap here...
 

AchtzehnBaby

Global Matador
Mar 28, 2013
15,182
9,028
Hazeldean Road
Isn't them having an off night and us winning as a result basically a subset of us being the better team that night?

I feel like in the Venn diagram of reasons for us winning, there'd be a lot of overlap here...

I don't think a Venn diagram helps here. ;)

giphy.gif
 

Do Make Say Think

& Yet & Yet
Jun 26, 2007
51,169
9,909
Brown is worse than Gudbranson.

Which is rather distressing.

However he'll likely be here next year and will probably play a bit more regularly with Gudranson gone (let's hope another team makes a good offer for him) and that might help his confidence. With the being, hopefully, better; he might not be so bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aragorn

aragorn

Do The Right Thing
Aug 8, 2004
28,608
9,124
It could be that both are bad and we should have to pick one or the other
I think they did that when they gave J. Brown a second yr on his contract whether that is the correct move remains to be seen, but I expect him to be the scapegoat on here next yr, if he plays much.
 

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
42,453
16,073
I think they did that when they gave J. Brown a second yr on his contract whether that is the correct move remains to be seen, but I expect him to be the scapegoat on here next yr, if he plays much.
Sorry I meant we shouldn’t have to pick on or the other. The fact we have both is pretty insane
 
Last edited:

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,130
9,701
I think they'll sign Zub, roll with Zaitsev and Zub in the top 4 and look to rotate JBD in for 40ish games, starting out in the A
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
53,863
31,086
I think they'll sign Zub, roll with Zaitsev and Zub in the top 4 and look to rotate JBD in for 40ish games, starting out in the A
It will be interesting to see what we do, a right side of Zaitsev, Zub, JBD doesn't offer much in terms of size and physicality, something DJ seems to like and i think we targetted this offseason. Couple that with Chabot and Brannstrom on the left, i can't see us not looking to insert a big guy somewhere in the lineup. That guy might be J.Brown as he is under contract, maybe we trade or sign a big bodied LHD.
 

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
15,751
9,966
Brown is a much better skater imo, but Gudbranson is more physical and seems to make better reads. When Gud gets beat it for some reason seems more obvious but I'm not so sure he gets beat more often. Worth keeping an eye out for it.
Brown has far better mobility and is better than Gudbranson with the puck, low bar. Brown only has 107 NHL games and the lack of experience shows. Brown is a good 7/8 D to have on the roster but he does get lost sometimes in coverage.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad