The Bored Man
5-14-6-1
"Semi-contact" is fine with me.
You're following the wrong sport.
"Semi-contact" is fine with me.
You're following the wrong sport.
The term semi-contact is meaningless on its own anyways.
I'm just going to go ahead and point out that the point of "check" is supposed to be to separate a player from the puck. Not to "hurt".
Its always good for a laugh when people start throwing out the whole skill vs toughness thing as if its either or thing.Pretty much. Fairly easy to pick out the individuals on this site who have never played contact hockey before. Hockey players aren't laser guided missiles who hit their target with pin-point accuracy and force. You throw a check as hard as you can and hope you give your opponent something to think about next time he goes into the corner to pick up the puck (and hopefully he coughs it up due to being gun-shy). If an injury occurs, that sucks, but it is also part of the game. You bleeding hearts out there can make your own men's non-contact league if none already exist (if it does exist, watch that and keep your yapper shut). If none exist, good luck to you.
Fake tough guys with no hockey sense that hit to hurt instead of hitting to separate players from the puck while not worrying incidental injuries usually end up posting on HFBoards just like everyone else with "limited" hockey experience.
Answer the question. I'm not comparing, I'm simply applying your logic. Or where does it stop with you? I mean, I would think skate cuts are far more dangerous than concussions so wouldn't it make more sense to apply your logic to prevent skate cuts? If so, then skating fast at all (and falling down) should be a penalty. Game misconduct for skating too fast (dangerous play). Makes sense, right?
I have to note that after watching Canada versus America, the refs dont seem so bad anymore.
Must be because they let the North American boys play their style.
I have to note that after watching Canada versus America, the refs dont seem so bad anymore.
Must be because they let the North American boys play their style.
spoke to soon. lol
I retract my comment.
Once again, the IIHF has relapsed back into joke status.
What a crummy league.
Anyone else notice that linesman are also blowing offside calls fairly often? I've noticed a few in earlier games but the one I just saw in the OT of the Germany/Slovakia game seemed costly.
Fake tough guys with no hockey sense that hit to hurt instead of hitting to separate players from the puck while not worrying incidental injuries usually end up posting on HFBoards just like everyone else with "limited" hockey experience.
Don Cherry is a sports icon in Canada, and is actually correct on a lot of what he says. The fact that some kid sitting at home posting on the internet thinks he knows more than a former NHL coach, former NHL Coach of the Year, former AHL Coach of the Year, and current hockey analyst who has been on TV spanning across 3 decades is embarrassing.
The only time I was a Devils fan was in 2001-2002, when Larry Robinson coached them. Or whenever they play the Rangers
But here we are talking KIDS. They don't anticipate, especially not coming from European youth championships.
To Beaker: I'm fine with pro-hockey becoming more like pond hockey. If every forward turns into Datsyuk and every defenseman into Lidstrom, who can take a puck away from you without as much as touching you, hockey will benefit greatly, IMHO.
Don Cherry also hasn't coached in about 30 years.
His time has come and gone.
And he was a mediocre coach. I prefer analysts like Hrudey, Ferraro, Roenick, etc. who have contemporary experience.
Anyone else notice that linesman are also blowing offside calls fairly often? I've noticed a few in earlier games but the one I just saw in the OT of the Germany/Slovakia game seemed costly.
Both in hockey and football I was taught to hit to hurt, but not to injure.
I'm just going to go ahead and point out that the point of "check" is supposed to be to separate a player from the puck. Not to "hurt".