missinthejets
Registered User
- Dec 24, 2005
- 4,734
- 618
Whats it going to change? Not much I would agree.
But what it would do is hopefully throw some accountability on these players. Maybe the organization would show that this is unacceptable and some players may kickstart there game?
At this point, I would agree it wouldn't change a lot. But any positive change at this point is a change that needs to be done.
Even overpay in a trade of prospects or picks in order to get a legit 2nd line center. Ask the Islanders how that has worked for them.
There is no chance the Oilers would pay 2 2nd's and a 3rd for 1 year of Boychuck. This is the whole problem.
Trading Gagner didn't do anything, trading Smid didn't do anything, adding veterans in Nikitin, Fayne, Purcell and Pouliot didn't do anything... roster changes aren't going to change anything about this team. It's not that players aren't trying, it's that the coach isn't putting players in a position to succeed and the results are predictable. Here's an example: with Kreuger running the PP Eberle was absolutely money playing down low to the net, so what does Eakins do? Puts him on the point. Yakupov had success as a rookie on the PP playing on the wall so what does Eakins do? You guessed it, he puts him on the point. That's just a couple examples of a coach clearly not understanding what his players are good at. He is trying to fit players into a role they aren't suited to. Time to get a coach who will create a system to fit what he does have. There is a real disconnect between what the GM is doing and what the coach is doing and that needs to be remedied. It's easier to try again on the coaching front than it is to replace the bulk of the players. Just have to hope that when mctavish pulls the trigger he does a better job selecting the next coach.