Idea to stop teams from tanking

Status
Not open for further replies.

LeafsNation75

Registered User
Jan 15, 2010
37,975
12,506
Toronto, Ontario
Which has nothing to do with what I just said. The Sabres were a pretext to get a system that literally gave half the league a shot at 1OA. 13 extra teams now have skin in the game, which was the real reason almost everyone wanted the lottery.
Even before when the NHL changed the rules to allow all non playoff teams with a chance at the 1st overall pick instead of the bottom 5 teams prior to 2013, that didn't matter to Murray. His main objective was to tank for McDavid knowing worst case he would get Eichel for finishing last place overall, because of the changes coming in 2016.
 

Silky mitts

It’s yours boys and girls and babes let’s go!
Mar 9, 2004
4,687
3,701
Weighted lottery to pick 4 teams for a tourney. I would watch it.
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,371
12,757
South Mountain
Why not just do the Roman army thing and have the last place team draw lots to stone two of their players? That ought to encourage everyone to play better.
 

sabremike

Friend To All Giraffes And Lindy Ruff
Aug 30, 2010
22,922
34,573
Brewster, NY
Arguably the most popular NHL team in America literally owes it's existence to tanking and getting Mario. The preachy stuff about tanking is pretty tiring at this point. And you can try to put together a bad roster but these guys are still paid professionals who are going to play hard. The tank Sabres were playing so hard under Nolan the last few months of the season they came close to getting out of the league basement.
 

GOilers88

#DustersWinCups
Dec 24, 2016
14,431
21,263
You can think that Toronto tanked on purpose but when they finished last it was with 69 points and did not clinch last place overall until their 82nd regular season game. When Buffalo tanked for McDavid had 54 points in 2015 and when Colorado finished last in 2017 they had a record low 48 points.
They still iced a team that wasn't going to get anything done with the intention of getting a shot at Matthews. Their point total is irrelevant. Colorado didn't intentionally trying and lose, they were just that f***in horrible in every facet of the game. The point total is irrelevant.

Buffalo is truly the only team in recent memory that blatantly tried to lose games to get a first overall and karma shat on their faces.

Tanking isn't an issue in the NHL, people here just like to label the bottom three teams in the league every year as tankers.
 

GodEmperor

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
2,919
3,168
Only increase odds slightly for the bottom 5 teams.

I would do it like this:
30-14
29-12
28-10
27-9
26-8
25-7
24-20-5.12
19-17-4.77

After the top 5 picks, the rest of the teams have the exact same odds.
 

LeafsNation75

Registered User
Jan 15, 2010
37,975
12,506
Toronto, Ontario
They still iced a team that wasn't going to get anything done with the intention of getting a shot at Matthews. Their point total is irrelevant. Colorado didn't intentionally trying and lose, they were just that ****in horrible in every facet of the game. The point total is irrelevant.

Buffalo is truly the only team in recent memory that blatantly tried to lose games to get a first overall and karma shat on their faces.

Tanking isn't an issue in the NHL, people here just like to label the bottom three teams in the league every year as tankers.
When Toronto realized during the 2015-2016 season they would not be making the playoffs they traded UFA's like James Reimer, Nick Spalling, Daniel Winnik, Roman Polak and Shawn Matthias. However they kept other UFA's like P.A. Parenteau, Brad Boyes, and Michael Grabner which I thought was shock that they were not traded, because after all they were tanking and that means trading all their soon to be UFA's. Buffalo traded anyone who was set to become a UFA and traded both their goalies who started the season. In fact one of their goalies was traded after he won like 2 or 3 games in a row, so talk about a coincidence in timing.
 

VoluntaryDom

Formerly DominicBoltsFan / Ⓐ / ✞
Oct 31, 2016
23,285
5,532
Tampa FL
Better idea. No RFA period. Entry level contract is two years. If the team still sucks, players leave...players keep leaving management gets fired fast. 10 years of this, teams fold.

Teams wouldn't tank for long, after a while they would just lose because no one good wants to stay. Doesnt solve teams being bad/tanking, but it would be fun to watch.

You won't solve tanking unless you impose some serious sanctions, which the NHL won't. Its part of the game...business is cyclical.
If that rule was in place no contender could ever retain their young talent under the cap
 
  • Like
Reactions: North Cole

Field of Dreams

Registered User
Oct 10, 2011
1,745
994
Port Credit
Easy solution is that all teams that miss playoffs have equal odds at winning a lottory spot, and after the lottery teams are ranked starting with the worst teams at the top of the draft (4th)
 

LeafsNation75

Registered User
Jan 15, 2010
37,975
12,506
Toronto, Ontario
Easy solution is that all teams that miss playoffs have equal odds at winning a lottory spot, and after the lottery teams are ranked starting with the worst teams at the top of the draft (4th)
The problem is what if a team who makes the playoffs also has another teams 1st round pick who has missed the playoffs. For example that situation could happen in 2019 with Colorado having Ottawa's 1st round pick. So what if they make the playoffs and end up with the 1st overall pick, is that going to be fair?
 

Field of Dreams

Registered User
Oct 10, 2011
1,745
994
Port Credit
The problem is what if a team who makes the playoffs also has another teams 1st round pick who has missed the playoffs. For example that situation could happen in 2019 with Colorado having Ottawa's 1st round pick. So what if they make the playoffs and end up with the 1st overall pick, is that going to be fair?

Well for the team trading their 1st pick in a year they do not make the playoffs - play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Nothing would be unfair about Colorado getting the 1st overall. They took the risk (however small it is) of the pick being 31st overall, and they deserve to awarded when that risk pays off.

Should the league block the Tavares signing because Montreal needed him more? Should the league take debrincat from Chicago and place him in Edmonton because of their respective records over the last decade?
 

BatVader

"nothing is true; everything is permitted"
May 16, 2015
12,838
11,972
Imperial Gotham
Take one of those lottery ball tumbler things.
Put the 1 ball in for every team that doesn’t make the playoffs. Have the logo of the teams on the balls. 1 ball has 1 teams logo.
Spin the stupid tumbler thing.
Open the little hatchy thing and let the balls out into the rail.
The picks are in order of the balls coming out.
1st ball out = 1st pick
2nd ball out = 2nd pick
Etc...
This is not freaking rocket science.
You can tank if you want, but there is not changing of odds based on final standings position.
Each team gets 1 ball and it’s luck of the draw.
 

cj19

Registered User
Jul 21, 2016
437
106
I think fans would like to watch this hockey tourney at the end of the year. Imagine this year Jack Hughes going to the winning team. The tv rating would be high for these 5 teams. The TV. revenue could divided by NHL owners and to pay players playing in the tourney.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
79,187
54,433
In a 31 team league, someone will finish 31st.

Let the season of misery be punishment enough, heaven forbid the league has a talent distribution system to actually provide some hope.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
79,187
54,433
Take one of those lottery ball tumbler things.
Put the 1 ball in for every team that doesn’t make the playoffs. Have the logo of the teams on the balls. 1 ball has 1 teams logo.
Spin the stupid tumbler thing.
Open the little hatchy thing and let the balls out into the rail.
The picks are in order of the balls coming out.
1st ball out = 1st pick
2nd ball out = 2nd pick
Etc...
This is not freaking rocket science.
You can tank if you want, but there is not changing of odds based on final standings position.
Each team gets 1 ball and it’s luck of the draw.

It's not rocket science but it's stupid. The Winnipeg Jets won the lottery in 2016 and took Laine but I'd argue in actual trouble could have used the pick more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad