Didn’t Toffoli go for a 2nd and a prospect?You guys know the drill for Kings offers.
A 1st and a youngster like every year
Iafallo is better now then when how Toffoli was at the deadline last year. Also Iafallo is a first line lw where Toffoli was 2nd rw This is why i think Iafallo has more value then Toffoli didDidn’t Toffoli go for a 2nd and a prospect?
eh, Iafallo is having a better year than Toffoli did last year but their value is pretty similar as a rental. i know he might be playing on your 1st line but i wouldnt call Iafallo a 1st liner.Iafallo is better now then when how Toffoli was at the deadline last year. Also Iafallo is a first line lw where Toffoli was 2nd rw This is why i think Iafallo has more value then Toffoli did
A 2nd/conditional first and a recent 15th overall pick for Iafallo? Come the hell on. Keep your guy for a playoff race by all means, no need to trade him, but that's slightly better than Coleman got and he was a) an overpay b) on pace for 30 goals, and c) had an extra year on his deal.
Dude there is no scenario where Iafallo is worth a five month recent 15th overall pick.From the kings pov we are moving our top line winger (one of our few established players that isnt geriatric) while nudging the playoffs.
The pick is probably a late 2nd and the prospect is not a sure thing (although an attractive asset) We are also retaining 50% at a time when team incomes are struggling.
I dont think it is that unfair of a trade.
Whether it is the right player for the leafs or not i dont know.
Flyers would do that for Laughton. If you look, Laughton is great at ES....tied for 50th in the league. All his points the last 2 years are at ES.
And if course he is a PKer instead of a PP guy.
I was pointing out that Laughton produces at a high ES rate...top 50 in the league this year.Iafallo and Kopitar are LA's top PK unit, so what's your point? In Iafallo, you get a guy who can play in all situations.
Didn’t Toffoli go for a 2nd and a prospect?