Brent Burns Beard
Powered by Vasiliev Podsloven
- Feb 27, 2002
- 5,594
- 580
i have for all this time been very much against the owners tactics and frankly still feel this would have been resolved if the owners had used a softer hand.
HOWEVER, what exactly do the players think they have to hold onto here ? they are a collective group of fools for not taking their stay of execution (on saturday) and making it work.
the NHL called their bluff and now everyone (staff, players, owners, fans, associated business) is losing out.
talk about stubborn. talk about being a victim of your own success. they are so rich (players) that they arent hungry enough to suck it up and "settle" for some less "fair". can you imagine the word "fair" being used so many times as the lone reason why they cant agree to share 42.5m X 30 between their brothers.
i still hold the owners accountable for getting the league into this mess, but my opinion on the players has changed big time in the last few weeks.
dont count me on the players side anymore. they had the chance to bail the NHL out and said screw you. i say screw them.
dr
HOWEVER, what exactly do the players think they have to hold onto here ? they are a collective group of fools for not taking their stay of execution (on saturday) and making it work.
the NHL called their bluff and now everyone (staff, players, owners, fans, associated business) is losing out.
talk about stubborn. talk about being a victim of your own success. they are so rich (players) that they arent hungry enough to suck it up and "settle" for some less "fair". can you imagine the word "fair" being used so many times as the lone reason why they cant agree to share 42.5m X 30 between their brothers.
i still hold the owners accountable for getting the league into this mess, but my opinion on the players has changed big time in the last few weeks.
dont count me on the players side anymore. they had the chance to bail the NHL out and said screw you. i say screw them.
dr