TheOllieC
cajun filet
Flyers fans were all over it, demanding No. 1. A few were willing to settle for "definitely Top 3."
"Some things never change, they just stay the same."
Flyers fans were all over it, demanding No. 1. A few were willing to settle for "definitely Top 3."
Lol yeah I knew as soon as it was posted how much outrage there'd be. Jesus Flyer fans are insufferable with their prospects
Probably true of us back then, too, though.It wasn't that long ago, 2011ish that they had arguably the worst crop of prospects of any other team. But you couldn't tell some of them that fact because they refused to believe it.
Probably true of us back then, too, though.
Necas needs to be a the real deal. A 1-2 lunch of he and Aho as legit top 6 centers is the key to this team being competitive in the next 5 years.
That and ofcourse someone’s making a ****ing save.
That's a $9-10M answer. Not sure we can afford to ask the question.Bobrovsky next summer...thats the answer.
That's a $9-10M answer. Not sure we can afford to ask the question.
That's a $9-10M answer. Not sure we can afford to ask the question.
That's a $9-10M answer. Not sure we can afford to ask the question.
If our two current goalies both suck, I'm not sure we can afford *not* to ask it.
I have been playing in the SKATR tool that was the basis for the Jaccob Slavin discussion earlier this week.
The caveats are: 1) it was only 10 games; 2) it was against several teams that were out of the playoffs, so the games weren't meaningful; 3) beginner's luck.
Still, Zykov played 10 games last season (including the last one on a line with another rookie, Roy, and Nordstrom), so his data are in the SKATR tool. I can't determine how to copy it into this post. Basically for those 10 games Zykov looks like a combination of Brad Marchand and Nikita Kucherov.
As excited as everyone is (and rightly so) about Svechnikov and Necas, is it possible that Zykov is 75% as good as this tool indicates? If so, then the top line will be quite strong in 18-19.
I also think Zykov's numbers support the arguments for those who think Aho is capable of being a #1 center.
Yeah I agree I think Zykov is more likely to have a greater impact *this* season than Necas.
As excited as everyone is (and rightly so) about Svechnikov and Necas, is it possible that Zykov is 75% as good as this tool indicates? If so, then the top line will be quite strong in 18-19.
Yeah I agree I think Zykov is more likely to have a greater impact *this* season than Necas.
Necas at Center has a bigger impact though.
I'm not as high on Zykov as many of you are. 17 of his 33 AHL goals were on the PP because he was getting prime PP time on a team that had one of the best powerplays in the AHL. Now, maybe some of that team PP success, was due to Zykov being on the PP, but I can't believe all of it was. I'm not so sure Zykov will get prime PP time on the Canes with guys like Aho, TT, Svechnikov, Necas, Rask, Staal, etc., and until I see it, I don't expect the Canes to have nearly as good of a PP, and NHL goalies are a lot harder to score on than AHL goalies. He also has never had a reputation for being strong defensively, which Brindy will demand.
It seems he's taking this opportunity seriously by staying in Raleigh this summer to work out, he has good hands, is physical and not afraid to go to the net so that part of it bodes well for him. If we get a good all around game from him and 15G-30P, that will be a big success in my book.
I'm not as high on Zykov as many of you are. 17 of his 33 AHL goals were on the PP because he was getting prime PP time on a team that had one of the best powerplays in the AHL. Now, maybe some of that team PP success, was due to Zykov being on the PP, but I can't believe all of it was. I'm not so sure Zykov will get prime PP time on the Canes with guys like Aho, TT, Svechnikov, Necas, Rask, Staal, etc., and until I see it, I don't expect the Canes to have nearly as good of a PP, and NHL goalies are a lot harder to score on than AHL goalies. He also has never had a reputation for being strong defensively, which Brindy will demand.
It seems he's taking this opportunity seriously by staying in Raleigh this summer to work out, he has good hands, is physical and not afraid to go to the net so that part of it bodes well for him. If we get a good all around game from him and 15G-30P, that will be a big success in my book.
I’m with you, except I don’t consider myself low on Zykov at all. 15 goals is exciting.
I'm not as high on Zykov as many of you are. 17 of his 33 AHL goals were on the PP because he was getting prime PP time on a team that had one of the best powerplays in the AHL. Now, maybe some of that team PP success, was due to Zykov being on the PP, but I can't believe all of it was. I'm not so sure Zykov will get prime PP time on the Canes with guys like Aho, TT, Svechnikov, Necas, Rask, Staal, etc., and until I see it, I don't expect the Canes to have nearly as good of a PP, and NHL goalies are a lot harder to score on than AHL goalies. He also has never had a reputation for being strong defensively, which Brindy will demand.
It seems he's taking this opportunity seriously by staying in Raleigh this summer to work out, he has good hands, is physical and not afraid to go to the net so that part of it bodes well for him. If we get a good all around game from him and 15G-30P, that will be a big success in my book.
15G is a good target for Z. 20G would be something to get excited about and anything more than that puts him squarely in the "Best value contracts in the league" discussion potting 20+ for $650k in 2019-20. I think he could be next year's Ondrej Kase putting up ~20/20 and opening a lot of eyes around the league.
For a guy whose goal scoring is about the only thing he brings to the table, 15 goals isn’t much above replacement level. Unless he’s a better defender or playmaker than advertised, he’s going to need to do a little better than that to make us a better team.
He tilted the ice heavily in the canes favor in the games he played. Small sample size but his style of play suggests he can maintain that positive impact.