We played juvy with most of the team being A and AA competitive players 1 year removed. It's not the NHL, no, but it was good hockey.
We had the stacked team, but they gave us an 18 year old goalie who never played hockey...while our team was made up of players who have played hockey 5 times a week for the past 12 years.
We didn't think it was hopeless that our goalie probably had a .700sv %. We just made sure to dominate out there and allow minimal shots and only from the perimeter.
I'm not saying our goaltending is good. It's awful. It's our weakest link. But the idea the team cant step up their game because they have weak goaltending is bonkers. It should motivate them that much more to play a solid defensive game knowing their goaltending sucks.
Having good goaltending gives you confidence to take chances offensively...but usually having bad goaltending makes you take less chances...why are we still giving up so many chances?
It's like those teams where they have a goalie playing their first NHL game. Good teams will limit the other teams chances knowing their goaltending might be weak.
We give the other team ample slot chances and all these odd man rushes.
It's fine to do that when you have confidence in your goalie to trade chances. We don't, so we shouldn't be trading chances...yet every game we use this strategy.
Why not act like you have an AHL backup in nets and try to limit the other team to under 25 perimeter shots like we see good defensive teams do.
Other teams get a lead and shut us down. Yet we can't shut other teams down with our play....when it's needed that much more because of weak goaltending. We don't know how to bear down and minimize shots or chances against. We play shinny and try to Deke the other team out breaking out at our Blueline.