ClassicHockey
Registered User
- May 22, 2005
- 595
- 6
Not sure about that. Do you have anything to back this up? I've seen the list of hockey people who were on the committee - 50 people who were all qualified to judge. I've seen the paperwork too.
There might have been some bias but you will always find that.
It certainly wasn't a 50 cents a message to Sportsnet by fans who never saw the older players play.
There might have been some bias but you will always find that.
It certainly wasn't a 50 cents a message to Sportsnet by fans who never saw the older players play.
The Hockey News list was based on personal feelings and not necessarily facts. I don't put much credibilty in it.