30Yonge
Registered User
- Jan 24, 2014
- 688
- 0
Get rid of the cap. Teams might take these contracts in such world.
I too look forward to returning to the days when a few teams had payrolls 90% higher than league average.
Get rid of the cap. Teams might take these contracts in such world.
2 years is too little, but I wouldn't be against recuperating buyouts every 5 years or so.
I just love how owner's are all: "LOWER THE SALARIES, WHY DO WE PAY THEM THIS MONEY? IT'S TOO MUCH!" every time a CBA is up and then not 1 year after the lockout give Clarkson $5.5 million for 6 years, Orpik the same for 5 years, Bolland the same...for **** sakes Gaborik is making less money than Dave ****ing Bolland.
It's embarrassing.
So more "get-out-of-jail-free" cards for rich teams who make terrible decisions?
Sounds like an awesome idea!
Saving the GMs from themselves is a terrible idea. Compliance buyouts as constant get out of jail free cards will just encourage constant risky, dumb contract offers.
Its not a free card. They still have to pay the player. I think it would result in more GM firings because there would be more GM's coming to their owner to explain how they have to buy out a mistake they made.
Do you think the owners like to pay buyouts ?
No guarantee contracts....like nfl.
Cut...see yeah...don't get a dollar..
It's cheaper than paying the full contract.
Just look at Sather and Holmgren. They threw around their owners money on terrible deals for years and weren't fired.
Hell yeah, intensity would pick-up league wide.
It would never fly with the PA tho...
Yay or Nay :
If you want to use a buy-out, you have to forfeit your 1st round pick the same year.
What are your thoughts?