???
You're only supposed to increase it by one each year.
that's amazing.Recently turned 29.
Been on HF since I was 12, so like 1999. Pavel Brendl and Jamie Lundmark FTW.
Started writing for HF in August of 2000 when I was 13. Guess they were pretty desperate in those days.
Laughed to myself recently when the Coyotes hired a 26 year old GM and wondered where I went wrong in life. Should've been me
that's amazing.
Way to make me feel good, Singin'.As if we needed something else to make us feel old, consider this: Jamie Lundmark is 35.
As if we needed something else to make us feel old, consider this: Jamie Lundmark is 35.
Brendl I knew was a risk.
Lundmark just flat out disappointed me.
I clearly remember the Roenick comparisons to Lundmark.Oh the hype around the pair. The next Trottier/Bossy.
Oh the hype around the pair. The next Trottier/Bossy.
How many members were a part of the original newyorkrangers.com message boards? What an interesting place that was. Still use some of the meme from those boards ("ZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzz", "How cares?", "Jarg").
I think Levitate is the only username I recognize from those boards.
And Malhotra was going to be the next Brian Skrudlund. Which he kinda did end up being. At least Malhotra was pretty successful in his career. Lundmark had a great camp his first year. He did look like Roenick. He didn't make the team because of how Manny was treated by Muckler the year before. I'm sure Lundmark's career would have ended up the same BUT I wonder sometimes what could've been. Cherneski is another guy that could've been a special player. (Well special to the Rangers at least)
It's amazing to think that the Rangers had two top 10 picks and both players busted. It's not like the Rangers were reaching for Brendl or Lundmark either. Still the best draft I have ever watched. It was like a dream come true. The Rangers were kinda rebuilding and it was happening in real time, at least they were taking an interest in the draft again. And both guys ended up sucking.
The two times the Rangers have had 2 first round picks in the past ~40 years have been just horrible drafts.And Malhotra was going to be the next Brian Skrudlund. Which he kinda did end up being. At least Malhotra was pretty successful in his career. Lundmark had a great camp his first year. He did look like Roenick. He didn't make the team because of how Manny was treated by Muckler the year before. I'm sure Lundmark's career would have ended up the same BUT I wonder sometimes what could've been. Cherneski is another guy that could've been a special player. (Well special to the Rangers at least)
It's amazing to think that the Rangers had two top 10 picks and both players busted. It's not like the Rangers were reaching for Brendl or Lundmark either. Still the best draft I have ever watched. It was like a dream come true. The Rangers were kinda rebuilding and it was happening in real time, at least they were taking an interest in the draft again. And both guys ended up sucking.
I clearly remember the Roenick comparisons to Lundmark.
The comparisons for Lundmark were so enticing: Trottier, Roenick, Yzerman, Sakic (at least those are the ones I remember).
He played a very similar game as an 18 year old in the WHL.
The first warning signs were that he seemed to lose some of that edge after his draft year. I also couldn't help but think he wasn't quite taking it up a notch the way I thought he would. Not that he was bad, but I started to wonder if he had top line production.
Still, his overall game seemed very well suited for the pros.
Lundmark still ranks as one of my all-time disappointments.
Overall, Lundmark, Steve Kelly and Jason Bonsignore are pretty high up there.
He was a good skater, had a great wrist shot, played tough, but then I met him and he was small. I mean if he was 5'10 160 pounds that would have been generous. He was listed a lot bigger than that, but wasn't, so his game ended up not translating. Ron Low, yes, Ron Low, tried his best by him as wing was his best shot. Remember meeting Malhotra and Kloucek on the same day. They were big boys.
We used to have debates on this board about Lundmark. Not you and me (we may have) but the board in general. I would love to know now if people still think the Rangers ruined him? That was the feeling on this board. That Messier was taking Lundmarks valuable minutes. I still don't agree with it but it was a "Ranger Board Fact" and if you argued the other side, well, you basically were fighting an uphill battle. Not that I minded the debates! The Rangers ruined Manny. An argument that I was wrong about. Not that they ruined him because he had a fairly successful career. But they didn't handle him correctly. Which they didn't. And that's all on Neil Smith who should've just sent Manny back to Junior when it was clear Muckler wasn't going to play him. Muckler was a terrible coach. He was so lost and those teams, looking back, should've made the playoffs. The Sather/Low/Trottier era teams were terrible.
Kelly and Bonsignore are two players that Sather gets killed for drafting and they were both thought of as sure fire NHL players. Especially Bonsignore. I remember THN or Hockey Digest calling him the next Mario Lemieux and he was a big kid.
How many members were a part of the original newyorkrangers.com message boards? What an interesting place that was. Still use some of the meme from those boards ("ZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzz", "How cares?", "Jarg").
I think Levitate is the only username I recognize from those boards.