huntison
Registered User
- Aug 12, 2008
- 4,899
- 30
I think you mean the Canucks MESSAGE BOARD got better by Vegas taking Sbisa..
Cuz the D and team is weaker without him.
Sbisa is brutal. No one cares he's gone.
I think you mean the Canucks MESSAGE BOARD got better by Vegas taking Sbisa..
Cuz the D and team is weaker without him.
I'm thinking Ottawa was hurt pretty bad today.
Sbisa is brutal. No one cares he's gone.
I think you mean the Canucks MESSAGE BOARD got better by Vegas taking Sbisa..
Cuz the D and team is weaker without him.
Yeah, you've made your unconditional love for Benning's acquisitions clear in the past. I don't see how getting rid of a replacement-level defender making $3.6m/year could be anything but a positive.
That's a beautiful dismissal of my point by hyperexgerrating my idealogy. You are simply wrong about the caliber of dman Sbisa is. Like the rest of the fan base... we'll agree to disagree.
To further oppose your nonsense, I don't think Baertchsi should be retained... another Benning acquisition.
But anyways.. point is.. our team is weaker without Sbisa today.
That's a beautiful dismissal of my point by hyperexgerrating my idealogy. You are simply wrong about the caliber of dman Sbisa is. Like the rest of the fan base... we'll agree to disagree.
To further oppose your nonsense, I don't think Baertchsi should be retained... another Benning acquisition.
But anyways.. point is.. our team is weaker without Sbisa today.
It's really not. Sbisa is objectively bad: Stats, eye-test both confirm this. I doubt he'll have another NHL contract.
Not much from a CBJ perspective.
The 1st was a late one. We'd already given up our 2017 2nd to Vancouver. Tells me CBJ management thinks this is a draft to skip.
Also Karlsson while a nice 4th line player for us really didn't make much of an impact.
Now they're out from Clarkson's contract which means they have more money at their disposal.
Well, in fairness, that pick could have picked up a good rental for next year. That's a pretty noticable loss.