RipCityPuckers
Registered User
You can clearly see that from the last draft, Kane goes #1 and Esposito goes #22?, the year before that they had Esposito going #1 overall and Kane was barely in the mix.
What does that have to do with greed?
You can clearly see that from the last draft, Kane goes #1 and Esposito goes #22?, the year before that they had Esposito going #1 overall and Kane was barely in the mix.
some people its fact. i just say "rumor" to have gotten that much.
but really tho he was a sure bet to go to NCAA then out of nowhere hes playing in the OHL
or they negotiate their own money deals and make life so much simpler as they do now.
does it make sense for a healthy scratch 16 yr old to make the same amount as 150pt scorer Kane? no it doesnt. thats exactly why they dont get paid the same amount.
What does that have to do with greed?
Its been written by more than one person. From USHR (Oct. 2006): "The OHL, knowing that there just aren’t enough quality players in Ontario to stock all of its 20 teams, has ramped up its US recruiting. We saw the attention lavished on the Under-18 Team’s Patrick Kane who, by the way, is second in the league scoring with a 9-13-22 line. Kane turned down a full scholarship from BU, and got $200,000 from the Knights."
The article also states that Sam Gagner got $300,000 in the WHL.
It makes plenty of sense. At that level you should be playing to get ahead NOT to make money.
Canadians take hockey way too serious. Whats going to happen next? pay 12 yearold phenoms 50k?
My whole point is some of you are saying its about "production" my point is these are unproven players. Every kid should be paid the same.
Hell I turned down minor league ball when I was 18 because I could make more working at a job then I would have playing ball in the summer. Everyone got the same except for what round/# pick you were and even the picks didnt make that much more. I was offered $300 bucks a week/$5,500 contract with a $1,500 bonus in A ball and we were all 18-21 years old. Every player I ever knew didnt expect or even talk about money, all they cared about was getting better and making it to the next level.
Thats why I find it ethically wrong to pay those kids mass amounts of money. You gotta earn your money and how are you going to earn money playing games in junior hockey with 16-18 year olds making more then some AHL players do? At that point you should be focusing on the future rather then "who's going to pay me the most".
I mean tell me how its fair that a guy like Kane was making more then some AHL players? "under the table" of course. and he wasnt even in pro hockey.
Its been written by more than one person. From USHR (Oct. 2006): "The OHL, knowing that there just aren’t enough quality players in Ontario to stock all of its 20 teams, has ramped up its US recruiting. We saw the attention lavished on the Under-18 Team’s Patrick Kane who, by the way, is second in the league scoring with a 9-13-22 line. Kane turned down a full scholarship from BU, and got $200,000 from the Knights."
The article also states that Sam Gagner got $300,000 in the WHL.
ok but that still has nothing to do with why Kane took out Esposito as #1 pick in the draft
he is ahead tho? 150 pt scorer deserve more money, a player like that helps the team sell tickets. a healthy scratch does **** all.
ok you crossed the line with that one. CANADIANS taking hockey serioulsy has absolutely nothing to do with paying a kid to come play for the team that drafted him. well sidney crosby never got 50K at 12 so i dont see your point? and why in Gods name would anyone even think to do that with a 12 yr old? pointless arugment.
That is the point.
It's almost as if going pro doesnt even matter because they are already making top dollar playing in a mock NHL.
Production should have nothing to do with pay scale in juniors/minors.
No wonder why kids come into the NHL with bad attitudes IE Daigle, Lindros ect.
Production should have nothing to do with pay scale at that level of hockey.
That would be like paying some 16-18 yearold kid at Mcdonalds based on howmany burgers he/she sells or cooks.
Lets start with the fact that they are KIDS? They arent pro athletes and just giving them 100k to play at 16-17 is wrong. It teaches them to be greedy especially when they lure them away from college. At that age they sould be learning hockey not "money".
Now I admire Toews even more. I wonder what they offered him to play? Im sure he was offered 50-75 grand if Kane was offered 100.
Anyone who thinks that 100k to play hockey when you're 16 is fine is most likely 16.
Pay some 300-400 a week, thats ok but to favor other players with cars and lots of money?
The ECHL isn't a junior league, in case the OP didn't know that.
That sounds about right for the Remparts, certainly at least $10MM annual revenues. I know for a fact Esposito received $500K for his first two seasons - 16 and 17 years old. I am not sure of his compensation as an 18 and 19 year old. There are ways to pay the players - and most top end kids slated to be high first round NHL picks get significant money.The CHL career is limited by age.
I don't see the link that you see with production. At any level hockey is about putting paying customers in the seats and generating revenues. Some do it with skills, others do it with brawn, others do it with personality, etc.
Issue is what is a fair players' share of the generated revenues and is this "fair share"
to be split equally or based on some form(s) of merit.
In the QMJHL the Remparts drew over 400,000 people this season, averaged over 11,000 per game. With admissions, food, souvenir and other concessions, plus televison and radio rights, board and program advertising plus misc revenue streams
they should have gross revenues approaching $15,000,000.
What percentage represents player salaries? At the published league rates = peanuts.
London, Kitchener, Windsor, Brampton and Ottawa.
I know for a fact those teams have done it, a couple other teams maybe here and there, but not that I know of.
It would be nice to see their income and expenses. Then people would stop assuming that there are raking in millions of dollars.
Its been written by more than one person. From USHR (Oct. 2006): "The OHL, knowing that there just aren’t enough quality players in Ontario to stock all of its 20 teams, has ramped up its US recruiting. We saw the attention lavished on the Under-18 Team’s Patrick Kane who, by the way, is second in the league scoring with a 9-13-22 line. Kane turned down a full scholarship from BU, and got $200,000 from the Knights."
The article also states that Sam Gagner got $300,000 in the WHL.
Of course someone cannot show you a cashed check to prove it to you. If that is the only type of proof that will convince you, no one will convince you.Complete ********. Its rumours that have no proof, and there will never be proof. If a player is good enough to warrant an OHL team recruiting them from an American University, than they will make plenty once they got to the NHL.
Of course someone cannot show you a cashed check to prove it to you. If that is the only type of proof that will convince you, no one will convince you.
The fact remains that these extra money deals violate the player contracts, but these deal happen - often - and money is paid to the player's family, often though a circuitous route and managed by their agent. It is the dirty secret of the CHL.
Believe what you want. It happens and all the inner circle in hockey on both sides of the border know it. Jeff Jackson from Notre Dame - who used to coach in the OHL - made several comments about it in public. Others probably won't go there because it is tough to make a claim without having the smoking gun paper trail or bank statements and without that it sounds like sour grapes.
The big market CHL teams have the resources to make these deals happen as per earlier posts by members in this thread. I know several NCAA coaches but more importantly on the proof side I know several player agents who represent CHL and NCAA players and have brokered such deals for clients - the marquee potential 1st round NHL picks.
If that is not enough proof for you, well suit yourself.