I find that when teams add a ton of random big name veterans in one offseason the recipe usually doesn't result in a significant turnaround. The big factor here will obviously be Ben Bishop.
On paper, they made some very good moves. Chemistry is the key, if they find some. This could be a good year for Dallas.
People who project more than around 50 points from Radulov next season are naive. A terrible character guy like that, no longer playing for a contract, while also being a year older? It wouldn't surprise me if the real reason he turned down Montreal wasn't that he didn't want to back down from his word, but because there are less cameras in Dallas to document his upcoming five year con job.
I find that when teams add a ton of random big name veterans in one offseason the recipe usually doesn't result in a significant turnaround. The big factor here will obviously be Ben Bishop.
This. Adding 4 core players in a week rarely pays off.
On paper they have one of the best roster in the league.
No 1D still.
Klingberg is a #1D by almost every statistical measure. Is he a shutdown dman? No. But neither is Burns, PK, Karlsson, OEL, Letang, Byflugien, Josi, or Keith. The hate train is getting ridiculous. You're underrating him because Ruff basically ran a 0 defense system that screwed the dmen, and he still put up similar shot suppression metrics to the names above. I'm looking forward to watching Kling prove everyone who just recites narratives wrong.This. Adding 4 core players in a week rarely pays off.
On paper they have one of the best roster in the league.
No 1D still.
OP didn't give a comprehensive list but he did pretty clearly include people of note who have been added.
Out:
Ruff and his unstructured, offense-heavy system
Niemi
Sharp
Eakin
Eaves
Hemsky
Hudler
Jordie Benn
In:
Hitchcock and a more structured, defensive-oriented philosophy
Bishop
Methot
Hanzal
Honka
These are the main additions and subtractions so far. It remains to be seen if Nill is finished, but as of now I don't see any way to call this offseason anything but positive for the Stars.
I can understand why an outsider looking in may not be all that impressed. As I have gotten a little older and unable to follow my team quite as much as I used to in all the minute details, Dallas looks to be a much different team. How successful they are next season mostly depends on two things IMO.
First, how do the players respond to the coaching change and altered organizational philosophy in style of play? This isn't the late 90's and Hitch isn't bringing in the trap, but he will demand a defensive accountability from him his best players that was unthinkable with Ruff. Hitch had a massive impact on Modano turning into the defensive player he became, which in no small part helped Dallas become one of the few powerhouse teams of the late 90's - early 2000's. He has spoken candidly about expecting Seguin to transform his game so that he can be a guy who can be counted on in all game situations, not just offensive ones.
Second, what kind of impact will the younger players have next season. Honka is expected to be a full timer and he looks ready. There could be growing pains or he could be a difference maker. Lindell had a very good rookie year; how does he build on that and continue to improve? Shore and Faksa are different types of players, but both are solid bets to improve on their nearly identical 33 point seasons last year. Faksa is as much of a "rock" as you can get from a young player. He plays a heavy game and does all the little things and attention to defensive detail we need more of in Dallas.
Personally, I think they underachieved last year and overachieved somewhat the year before. I'm not ready to talk playoffs yet by any means but the team seems better right now. If they were to add Radulov I think they get put into the "definitely should make the playoffs" category.
People are underestimating Hanzal's impact. He's going to help the D tremendously.
So it's clear you know absolutely nothing ablut lindy ruff and how he coaches.
Ruff was a scapegoat for the terrible d goaltending Dallas had. I mean he has structure and it's not clueless offense. That's just what you will get with a team that has run and gun players and no defense
OP didn't give a comprehensive list but he did pretty clearly include people of note who have been added.
Out:
Ruff and his unstructured, offense-heavy system
Niemi
Sharp
Eakin
Eaves
Hemsky
Hudler
Jordie Benn
In:
Hitchcock and a more structured, defensive-oriented philosophy
Bishop
Methot
Hanzal
Honka
These are the main additions and subtractions so far. It remains to be seen if Nill is finished, but as of now I don't see any way to call this offseason anything but positive for the Stars.
I can understand why an outsider looking in may not be all that impressed. As I have gotten a little older and unable to follow my team quite as much as I used to in all the minute details, Dallas looks to be a much different team. How successful they are next season mostly depends on two things IMO.
First, how do the players respond to the coaching change and altered organizational philosophy in style of play? This isn't the late 90's and Hitch isn't bringing in the trap, but he will demand a defensive accountability from him his best players that was unthinkable with Ruff. Hitch had a massive impact on Modano turning into the defensive player he became, which in no small part helped Dallas become one of the few powerhouse teams of the late 90's - early 2000's. He has spoken candidly about expecting Seguin to transform his game so that he can be a guy who can be counted on in all game situations, not just offensive ones.
Second, what kind of impact will the younger players have next season. Honka is expected to be a full timer and he looks ready. There could be growing pains or he could be a difference maker. Lindell had a very good rookie year; how does he build on that and continue to improve? Shore and Faksa are different types of players, but both are solid bets to improve on their nearly identical 33 point seasons last year. Faksa is as much of a "rock" as you can get from a young player. He plays a heavy game and does all the little things and attention to defensive detail we need more of in Dallas.
Personally, I think they underachieved last year and overachieved somewhat the year before. I'm not ready to talk playoffs yet by any means but the team seems better right now. If they were to add Radulov I think they get put into the "definitely should make the playoffs" category.
This is a good post. They have a good chance to make the playoffs, but I think Seguin may struggle as his skillset isn't suited to a Hitchcock system.