He currently leads Hedman and Carlson by 4 points.
Is that enough to win?
If not then what is?
5? 8? 10?
Is that enough to win?
If not then what is?
5? 8? 10?
Shouldn't be very many since he's better defensively than most of his competition.
I don't really understand why he's now considered some offensive defenseman.
He's elite defensively as well, but he won't get the nod just based on that because unfortunately it's now a reputation award and Hedman/Carlson have that reputation already.
It's Irrelevant how many points he has, if his team misses the playoffs he's not winning the Norris.
Fox needs Victor Hedman to retire before May to win the Norris.
Likely part of a very small minority who thinks thatThere are plenty of Norris contenders this year, and I'm far from the only one who isnt sure he gets nominated. Definitely in the top 5-6 though.
There are plenty of Norris contenders this year, and I'm far from the only one who isnt sure he gets nominated. Definitely in the top 5-6 though.
have you followed the way the Norris has been awarded? it sadly is basically a points race.Irrelevant. He just needs to be the best defenseman.
have you followed the way the Norris has been awarded? it sadly is basically a points race.
have you followed the way the Norris has been awarded? it sadly is basically a points race.
It's Irrelevant how many points he has, if his team misses the playoffs he's not winning the Norris.
That would be nice, but hockey writers are a lazy bunch who look at Stat sheets to vote on awards instead of actually watching all the games.Irrelevant. He just needs to be the best defenseman.