The one thing Wolski isn't and will never be is be a solid third liner.
O RLY?What is he, a solid 2nd liner? Please.
If he was on any team actually decent he would never crack a Top 6.
O RLY?
What makes you think a soft skill winger would make a solid 3rd liner?
O RLY?
What makes you think a soft skill winger would make a solid 3rd liner?
I'm confused what you're trying to say here.
He is a third line player on a good team, a 2nd line player on a bad team (Caps)
Really not that hard to follow bud.
It seems the most consistent are those with something to prove
WW
Ribs
Green
Ward
Kundratek
Maybe Fehr
He's saying that Wolski's skill set means he's either a Top 6 forward or he doesn't play - he hasn't got the physical game or the attitude to be in the bottom 6. On that note, he's been good for the money and would make an excellent complimentary piece in a stronger top 6.
I thought F16 had some nice shifts yesterday, but Locker noted that their much better 3rd period did not feature that line hardly at all, so maybe he's an anchor. Not sure what to think about Eric.
My XBox broke so I didn't get NHL 13.The point he's making is that Wolski is talked about the same way many of us talk about Galiev. He gets a top 6 spot where his skill can be complemented, or nothing, because he's not the kind of player you want on a third line. He doesn't bring enough to the table.
I hate to say it, but it's honestly another EA GM thing to do. Certain players can't play the traditional bottom six role, and aren't so spectacularly good at something else that they merit the spot anyway.
My XBox broke so I didn't get NHL 13.
My bad.