Wami
Chicken Lyfe'
- Mar 8, 2013
- 1,106
- 0
Leadership is a buzz word that has been floating around the media consistently within the past few days.
Simply put, tons of people are saying this team has "No Leadership", yet frankly the definition of leadership is extremely vague.
Is it the guy who scores the game tying goal or the game winner when it really matters? Is it the veteran guy who's won it all and knows what winning takes? Is it the guy who picks a fight when the team is down?
Despite those questions - we do have a specific problem. We can perform and compete with the best of them, yet fail continually against the leagues worst. Our effort every night is a roller-coaster, we are inconsistent, and we have collapsed in spectacular fashion for THREE years in a row.
What kind of leadership are we missing that prevents us from suffering from these glorious collapses? More grit, more talent, more "character"?
What I want to know is: What needs to be done in order to make sure this team has a strong sense of leadership to draw from? Do we bring in old veterans if we can make cap space? Do we sit with what we have and just write the various collapses off as learning experiences?
I see our "on paper" leadership as Phaneuf, Bolland, Clarkson, Kessel, Lupul, Gleason (maybe), Bozak (maybe).
I see our actual leadership as Kessel, Lupul, Bozak and Phaneuf. And that makes me sad.
What should be done?
Simply put, tons of people are saying this team has "No Leadership", yet frankly the definition of leadership is extremely vague.
Is it the guy who scores the game tying goal or the game winner when it really matters? Is it the veteran guy who's won it all and knows what winning takes? Is it the guy who picks a fight when the team is down?
Despite those questions - we do have a specific problem. We can perform and compete with the best of them, yet fail continually against the leagues worst. Our effort every night is a roller-coaster, we are inconsistent, and we have collapsed in spectacular fashion for THREE years in a row.
What kind of leadership are we missing that prevents us from suffering from these glorious collapses? More grit, more talent, more "character"?
What I want to know is: What needs to be done in order to make sure this team has a strong sense of leadership to draw from? Do we bring in old veterans if we can make cap space? Do we sit with what we have and just write the various collapses off as learning experiences?
I see our "on paper" leadership as Phaneuf, Bolland, Clarkson, Kessel, Lupul, Gleason (maybe), Bozak (maybe).
I see our actual leadership as Kessel, Lupul, Bozak and Phaneuf. And that makes me sad.
What should be done?