JimEIV
Registered User
- Feb 19, 2003
- 66,192
- 28,543
They didn't go to arbitration. He should have.That's how arbitration works. It is in fact, one of the fairest contracts in the league.
They didn't go to arbitration. He should have.That's how arbitration works. It is in fact, one of the fairest contracts in the league.
I think we can be fairly certain that Bratt wasn't offered fair value based solely on the fact that he has a one year deal worth 5.4M.
Bratt is making just about the same as Tatar is this year in actual dollars. That's not right.
They didn't go to arbitration. He should have.
I could see Fitz being willing to give more money quicker to Mercer given he has had a better start to his career than Bratt. He also drafted him, etc. I’m not worried about that in the slightest.I think either they sign Mercer long-term soon, or they'll have to give him fair market value after 3-4 years, which I'm not all that worried about assuming the cap finally starts to inch back upward by then.
I could see Fitz being willing to give more money, more quickly to Mercer given he has had a better start to his career than Bratt.
No shit. They split the difference of their asks in arbitration, which is what the arbitrator generally does anyway. Everyone knows what's involved there.
I meant to say that I could see Fitz giving a big contract to Mercer as soon as this summer given his career start and arc.That wouldn't make sense, Bratt's gonna be barely shy of PPG at the worst for 2 years in a row. You don't pay guys for how their careers start lol
It was reported that Fitz offered Bratt over Nico’s number and slightly under Hughes’ number and that negotiations were cut off by Bratt’s camp right then and there.You think the arbiter would have split the difference between 4.1 and 6.5?
Regardless look at those two numbers. One looks much more good faith to me than the other all things considered.
You think the arbiter would have split the difference between 4.1 and 6.5?
Regardless look at those two numbers. One looks much more good faith to me than the other all things considered.
That may have been reported, but it doesn't seem to at all jive with his 6.5 ask heading towards arbitration?It was reported that Fitz offered Bratt over Nico’s number and slightly under Hughes’ number and that negotiations were cut off by Bratt’s camp right then and there.
I mean, Fitz probably didn’t offer him about 4 mil either, so it’s most likely 2 camps going low to avoid arb. Wouldn’t be surprised if Fitz offered Bratt about 7.85 mil and Bratt just shut down.That may have been reported, but it doesn't seem to at all jive with his 6.5 ask heading towards arbitration?
That may have been reported, but it doesn't seem to at all jive with his 6.5 ask heading towards arbitration?
For 8 years maybe.... I'd shut it down too.I mean, Fitz probably didn’t offer him about 4 mil either, so it’s most likely 2 camps going low to avoid arb. Wouldn’t be surprised if Fitz offered Bratt about 7.85 mil and Bratt just shut down.
You would’ve shut down the first offer slightly under 8 with no counter offer or negotiations? More power to you I guess.For 8 years maybe.... I'd shut it down too.
Fitz was trying to get extra UFA years low cost. Nico and Jack contracts expire at 28....and they want to take Bratt into his 30's at a "fair price" in today's dollars. I'd shut that down too.
Now if you said 4 years at 7.8, I guarantee you Bratt would be signed to that deal in a second.
Yup. I wouldn't negotiate those later years at a "fair price"You would’ve shut down the first offer slightly under 8 with no counter offer or negotiations? More power to you I guess.
Bratt vs Mercer early career comparison is pretty interesting. Both started their NHL careers in their +2. Edit: though Mercer was nearly a full year older.I meant to say that I could see Fitz giving a big contract to Mercer as soon as this summer given his career start and arc.
Of course I wasn’t talking about right now. I’d pay Bratt now.
Bratt vs Mercer early career comparison is pretty interesting. Both started their NHL careers in their +2. Edit: though Mercer was nearly a full year older.
Bratt Rookie year: 13-22-35 in 74 gp.
Bratt 2nd year. 8-25-33 in 51 gp.
Totals 21-47-68 in 125 gp.
Mercer Rookie year 17-25-42 in 82 gp
Mercer 2nd year 19-20- 39 in 59 gp(thus far).
Totals 36-45-81 in 141.
Need to factor in Mercer is playing on a more talented team, but he has produced at a better rate
Yes, and one is a better rate than the other.Those rates are nearly identical?
81 in 141 is .57 PPG
68 in 125 is .54 PPG
Those rates are nearly identical?
81 in 141 is .57 PPG
68 in 125 is .54 PPG
Ya, and one is much more goal heavy as well.Yes, and one is a better rate than the other.
Yeah 2 points over 82 games better...lol.Yes, and one is a better rate than the other.
Yeah, he has a bit of belly (probably only noticeable due to tucked in shirt) but yeah, his face hasn’t aged. Someone else commented on that. And I’m pretty sure he hardly had any hair 15-20 years ago or it was that really thin blonde hair that a lot of blonde guys have.Got done watching the full game and ceremony, is it just me or does Rafalski look almost exactly like he did 20 years ago? Everybody else looks 20 years older (especially Niedermayer but he's been gray since he was still playing). Langenbrunner looks pretty rough too, but he's been a cranky old man since like 2010.