I've been watching since the 60s and I think the exact opposite.McDavid dominates a sheet of ice better then all of those guys. ...
But he’s been watching really intently since probably 2016, so there.I've been watching since the 60s and I think the exact opposite.
Agreed. Lidstrom has 7 Norris.Eddie Shore had 4 Harts and wouldve had 7-8 Norris
Crosby, Hašek, Lidström, Jágr were better than McDavid.
McDavid is better than Potvin.
The old-timers I haven't really seen beyond clips, I assume McDavid compares favorably to most.
Please vote for the hockey players who were better than Connor McDavid.
I don´t know. If this would be genuine attempt to talk about hockey history of players I would hope OP would give some insight of the players.But because that isn´t provided I go with McDavid.
This would have been better served in the HOH Section, where Hawkman frequents.
Eddie Shore had 4 Harts and wouldve had 7-8 Norris
Lidstrom is quickly turning into the one of the most overrated players in history. Playing on stacked teams in a watered down era where teams thrived on playing the trap.. never really being dominant in any one season... just consistent...and winning Norris Trophies in several seasons where he had no business winning. 7 Norris Trophies.. you can't take that away from him, but his reputation won him at least 3.
Howe started his NHL career just 7 years after Shore retired. So wheres your line?Eddie Shore was 3 years away from being born in the 19th century (the 1800s), and was 90yr old Don Cherry's coach in the minors FFS .
Can we really compare anything he did in the game with what we're watching today? I think not lol.