aleshemsky83
Registered User
- Apr 8, 2008
- 17,802
- 424
Yes, I'm very surprised that basketball is lower than soccer; it makes no sense. I dislike both sports, but definitely basketball challenges hockey for being almost continual action. It's truly as if the numbers for those two sports, soccer and basketball, should be reversed.
Thats why theres 48 under it, theres 48 minutes in a game
Im assuming they are talking about the times where the "ball" is in play.
If you consider only the Big 4 sports leagues in that chart, the answer should be no.
It looks like the least amount of action the sport has, the more money it makes.
I also don't get why they didn't use a percentage instead of minutes. Basketball's action is 100% of it's game time, just like the NHL.
Also, what are they considering action for the MLB? There's no clock in baseball, so it looks like they are just deciding on their own where to start and stop their stopwatch. When a catcher is giving his signals to the pitcher, is that not part of the time? How about pick-offs to first? A mound visit? Those are all important parts of the game, but usually people don't decide to count that in their clock.
Again, it's likely referring to any time the ball is actually in play
edit: well I probably shouldve clicked the link first,
that is what it is reffering to