Undertakerqc
Registered User
- Dec 24, 2011
- 3,282
- 0
Here is the video from Sportsnets on realignement issue: http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2013/02/26/nhl_realignment_proposal/?source=video
Here is a thing i'm wondering about realignment..
What happens when teams finally get back to Quebec City? and another team does make its way to Toronto?
I mean do they simply move Detroit back to the West?
Here is a thing i'm wondering about realignment..
What happens when teams finally get back to Quebec City? and another team does make its way to Toronto?
I mean do they simply move Detroit back to the West?
Here is a thing i'm wondering about realignment..
What happens when teams finally get back to Quebec City? and another team does make its way to Toronto?
I mean do they simply move Detroit back to the West?
this was my thought.
How can a division be named the Atlantic and the bruins are not in it. You can see the Atlantic from the city... can't get too much closer.
I want new names! Orr division.
Actually, it's pretty easy to do it, although not in the way described entirely. One team in each division in the West will play two of their opponents in the division four times. For both of those opponents, that team is the one they play 4 against. The team that gets two intradivision opponents 4 times also gets one extra game against the team in the other division in the same circumstance.
For example.
Team|Div 5x|Div 4x|Conf 3x|Conf 4x
ANA|LAK, SJS, PHX, VAN, CGY|EDM|All|None
LAK|ANA, SJS, PHX, VAN, EDM|CGY|All|None
SJS|ANA, LAK, PHX, CGY, EDM|VAN|All|None
PHX|ANA, LAK, SJS, CGY, EDM|VAN|All|None
VAN|ANA, LAK, CGY, EDM|SJS, PHX|CHI, COL, DAL, MIN, STL, WPG|NSH
CGY|ANA, SJS, PHX, VAN, EDM|LAK|All|None
EDM|LAK, SJS, PHX, VAN, CGY|ANA|All|None
| | | |
CHI|COL, DAL, MIN, NSH, STL|WPG|All|None
COL|CHI, DAL, MIN, NSH, WPG|STL|All|None
DAL|CHI, COL, MIN, STL, WPG|NSH|All|None
MIN|CHI, COL, DAL, STL, WPG|NSH|All|None
NSH|CHI, COL, STL, WPG|DAL, MIN|ANA, LAK, SJS, PHX, CGY, EDM|VAN
STL|CHI, DAL, MIN, NSH, WPG|COL|All|None
WPG|COL, DAL, MIN, NSH, STL|CHI|All|None
They're planning on revisiting this in 2015. My guess would be that Colorado would bump to the Pacific and both Detroit and Columbus bump back West if QC and TO do get teams.
I wouldn't be surprised if Illitch and the BJ's owner (don't know who it is, sorry) were told, "We will put you in the east for now. However, if Quebec or Toronto/Hamilton/wherever in the east gets a team, then Detroit goes back to the west, and if they both get teams then Columbus goes back." Assuming all else is equal. So if Quebec gets an expansion team, but <insert any east team> moves West, then we will re-visit.
I remember many here stating "not looking good for you Qc guys".
Well, final answer, month of may, like I posted in the clowns thread.
I wouldn't be surprised if Illitch and the BJ's owner (don't know who it is, sorry) were told, "We will put you in the east for now. However, if Quebec or Toronto/Hamilton/wherever in the east gets a team, then Detroit goes back to the west, and if they both get teams then Columbus goes back." Assuming all else is equal. So if Quebec gets an expansion team, but <insert any east team> moves West, then we will re-visit.
Or, could they set the time of the games to accomodate the Wings, the Jackets, playing west? Not possible because of TV of course.
I understand the Wings point of view. Should Detroit be east of Columbus, they would be fine..
Could be, but Tampa is doing very well, has a strong owner, and a pretty good fanbase of their own, along with the transplants. I doubt they are going anywhere anytime soon. Not sure on the Florida situation.They also could have said:
"So we put both those Florida teams to showcase them to Canadian Millionaries at "Canadian division" and we will sell them to Quebec and Hamilton/Markham, when the price is right."
"When the organizations are already put to the new Central, we don't have to juggle those god damn divisions."
***
Just imagine. Ontario-based Steven Stamkos to lead a franchise at Hamilton/Markham and Quebec-based Jonathan Huberdeau to lead the franchise at Quebec. Not to Mention that Stamkos is from Markham, but I still see Hamilton as a better fit.
Two teams with operating loss over 10 million dollars a year transfers to a Canadian lucrative hockey market.
Then move that Phoenix (operating loss of over 20 million a year) to Seattle, to at least even Hockey market.
NHL would absolutely flourish financially after those moves.
Could be, but Tampa is doing very well, has a strong owner, and a pretty good fanbase of their own, along with the transplants. I doubt they are going anywhere anytime soon. Not sure on the Florida situation.
Conferences are arraigned by time zone, without regard to equal number of teams, or chances of any given team of making the playoffs. This alignment is strictly about time zones, nothing more, other considerations had to be thrown out the window. As for scheduling regular season play, it will be flexible, as the three western-most conferences are generally treated as one conference for scheduling proposes, with certain adjustments being made to maintain a fair number of EST-CST match-ups. (This, admittedly, also contradicts my previous argument of needing a wide variety of playoff match-ups, at least as far as three of the conferences go, but oh well. This alignment also goes completely out the window - likely to be thrown out - if Phoenix is moved anywhere out of the Mountain time zone, but I'm counting on that not happening. It is ready-made to accommodate expansion markets in any the three western-most zones - preferably both in the CST if odds of making the playoffs are an absolute consideration - though this might result in one or two conferences having an odd number of teams, and makes no consideration for the possibilities of Quebec or a second Toronto team.)
EST (16 teams, no divisions - Top eight make the playoffs, & play in their own bracket)
CST (6 teams - Top four make the playoffs, & play in their own bracket in the first two rounds)
MST (4 teams - Top two make the playoffs, & play in the first round, meets PST winner in second round *see note above about
PST (4 teams, same deal as MST)
The first-round of the playoffs in 2012, assuming all else was equal, would have looked like this:
EST
01 NY Rangers vs. 08 Washington
04 Boston vs. 05 Detroit
------
02 Pittsburgh vs. 07 Florida
03 Philadelphia vs. 06 New Jersey
CST
01 St. Louis vs. 04 Dallas
02 Nashville vs. 03 Chicago
MST
01 Phoenix vs. 02 Calgary
PST
01 Vancouver vs. 02 San Jose
(You'll notice the eventual Cup winner in real-time, LA, doesn't make it in under this alignment. Well, they were the eight-seed, and there are a lot of scenarios where they wouldn't have made it in under the proposed alignments floated about. If standings were arraigned, firstly, but number of wins as it should be, LA wouldn't have made it under the current alignment. And, yes, occasionally a real dog like last year's Calgary & Dallas teams might make it in, in lieu of perhaps most deserving teams in other conferences, but that's really no different than it is now.)
Yes, I also see Florida more probable to move to Quebec and Tampa to stay at their position.
Expansion to Hamilton/Markham and Phoenix to Seattle and another expansion to West. That would push Detroit back to Midwest but before that let's enjoy these years again with East.
I hope you are right. But, do you have a source?
They just said on sportnets that NHLPA is holding an agreement, wanting to have a contengency plan should the Coyotes move to Québec City.
Finally. Someone has some sense here. There shouldn't be any agreement unless a contingency plan is part of it or everyone knows what's happening in Phoenix. This all becomes pointless if we're fitting Quebec City back into the East. Although, in the 90s, no one had a problem with an emergency realignment to make sure the Avalanche weren't in the Eastern Conference, for any amount of time.
I don't get the need for a wildcard. Since we're going to two conferences with two divisions each, thankfully, why not simply have the top four in each division make the playoffs and then they're seeded according to points and stuff. And then we play the normal 1 vs. 8 and so on. No divisional playoffs please!
I don't get the need for a wildcard. Since we're going to two conferences with two divisions each, thankfully, why not simply have the top four in each division make the playoffs and then they're seeded according to points and stuff. And then we play the normal 1 vs. 8 and so on. No divisional playoffs please!
Here is a thing i'm wondering about realignment..
What happens when teams finally get back to Quebec City? and another team does make its way to Toronto?
I mean do they simply move Detroit back to the West?