SnarkAttack
Registered Loser
Same reason you go for the ninth goal I guess....
Yes, let's compare a 9th goal to trying to injure someone. They're definitely the same thing.
Same reason you go for the ninth goal I guess....
ok. Your opinion. Would you be angry if a Tampa player blew up EP40 with 3 minutes left when they were losing 8-2? I think you might be upset just a tad. Overall, just not a good look on Jake. That's all.
Yes, let's compare a 9th goal to trying to injure someone. They're definitely the same thing.
Point is you play the game to the end.....you can’t have it both ways...keep your head up....in my opinion it wasn’t a dirty hit...Yes, let's compare a 9th goal to trying to injure someone. They're definitely the same thing.
When is the last time a team got TWO 5 on 3's in one game?
NHL refs at it's finest. They miss a blatant trip to a Hawk one way then start it off calling a trip the other way.
Wow Chara can stay on his skates for more than 1.5 seconds when he’s fighting a little guy...and then he gets wobbly knees. LOL
I did that once in a 13-4 beer league win.How is Hedman -1 in a 9-2 game?
Lost 8 out of the last 10, we're going in some full Oilers mode at the moment.Lol wtf no goddamn way
I mean compared to Chara Giant Baba would be considered a "little guy".Wow Chara can stay on his skates for more than 1.5 seconds when he’s fighting a little guy...and then he gets wobbly knees. LOL
Doesn’t matter. We had the worst possible December and still in a playoff spot.Lost 8 out of the last 10, we're going in some full Oilers mode at the moment.
It was a split second deflection where the Jackets' player touched the puck right before Lindholm did. The officials treated it like a possession play, which is a pretty horrible call.So apparently the Ducks coaching staff has no idea how the offside rule works (or their video guy missed the minor detail that a Ducks player negated the offside by putting it into his own end).