aufheben
#Norris4Fox
I don't have a problem with the Wings playing like that, it's just kind of hilarious. Would not want to play them in the Spring though.
IT was a follow through on playing the puck, thats never a penalty, take off the homer glasses.
I think he was more mad they blew the whistle, he was probably wanting the play to continue so they'd have less PP time in regulation, he has a beef because he never had possession.
Really really really poor definition of elite
Atrocious call on Stepan. This game is a prime example of why we need coach's challenge.
I can't believe you haven't caught on to the fact that I'm poking fun at Rangers fans who have made multiple threads claiming that.
He motioned about the holding of the stick. Could've gone offsetting like before.
A coach's review for potential goals maybe. But for penalty calls would be awful. It's all subjective and I can't see refs backing down. the league just needs better reffing.
What were you going to challenge there? Hugging is not allowed. Even if interference was not called on the Wings earlier, and even if Nyqvist put in a little extra effort to make sure the ref saw it, Stefan committed a penalty there.
Nyquist didn't hold his stick, he held the arm that was holding him.
That's a good goal? Lots of interference in front of the net...
Lol cute excuses for the "cup favorite"
I have to assume you are "that guy" on the Red Wings forums that every team has.
Well ALL goals should be reviewable (those bad goaltender interference calls). But you really can't blame refs for making mistakes, but with all the technology we have now there is no reason to not, at the very least, make one call reviewable per team per game.
As did Nyqvist for holding.
Refs gave this one to the Red Wings.
Team that constantly interferes takes a few penalties? Well I'll be damned.
I have to assume you are "that guy" on the Red Wings forums that every team has.