34
Registered User
- Mar 26, 2010
- 21,592
- 9,430
Marner sucksThe Marner disrespect!
Marner sucksThe Marner disrespect!
I would have never ever guessed that Skinner had this level up to him..Say it with me
Stuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
They should have had more actually.Is Canucks getting enough PP tonight or they need more in the third.
What parade?Looks like the parade’s back on the menu, Toronto!
It’s okay. I know you are too busy being propagandized on the mains into non-belief.I would have never ever guessed that Skinner had this level up to him..
Yeah no kidding.What parade?
Not sure where it is in the rules.
But i've seen it implemented this way before.
Just waiting til they start losing againA 12 game winning streak right after an 8 game winning streak and barely in the playoffs?
Oilers hockey.
Its in the rulebook if you look online, page 151, example 19.Well it's clearly a rule since no one on the Kraken complained about it, but I just don't understand how it works. They deferred Ekholms 2 min penalty by 3 min, but did Ekholm step on the ice during any of those 5 minutes?
A 4 game losing streak after April 20th works for me.Just waiting til they start losing again
#gamesinhandA 12 game winning streak right after an 8 game winning streak and barely in the playoffs?
Oilers hockey.
Thats not how major penalties work. Edit: guess its only last 5 minutes of the game.I was wondering the same
It was 5on5
Gourde 5 min penalty
Ekholm 2 min penalty
It should have been 4on4 for 2 minutes and then a 3 minute powerplay.
Instead it was a 3 minute powerplay then 4on4 for 2 minutes
#Peakingearly