m0pe
Registered User
- Feb 24, 2020
- 4,281
- 4,707
Aren't you?
22nd in a 32 team game is only 11th worst by my pro maths
Aren't you?
I retract my statement. I'm proud of you.22nd in a 32 team game is only 11th worst by my pro maths
Oh so this is my team without Svechnikov, Fiala, and Little?I have to repeat that if player trades are not reflected in the pick sheet, then these are wrong.
I have to repeat that if player trades are not reflected in the pick sheet, then these are wrong.
Sure would be. Who's the jobber that for fleeced by you?Oh so this is my team without Svechnikov, Fiala, and Little?
4 way trade. I would've rather it got veto'd back then.Sure would be. Who's the jobber that for fleeced by you?
That's nearing veto quality.
Players living within Sudbury only. Can you name the best one?Wolves only.
^actually if anyone can, I'd be really impressed
He was unreal man, first time in a long time the whole city loved a player. Probably liked more than Byfield here tbh. But best player whos home is in Sudbury is a whole different story.Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen for starting goalie
Wait--do the pick tables reflect trades, or do I have to scour for that personally?
4 way trade. I would've rather it got veto'd back then.
Do you think I'd be higher or lower then?
Good to know Vegas didn't win itVegas was much higher in my rankings before that trade.
That would be phenomenal, you gem.No.
I have the current rosters in an Excel sheet, let me know if you want it.
lets goooo updated panda rankingsThat would be phenomenal, you gem.
PandaHey guys, just got home.
Could help me out in DM real quick. hockey related.
or if somebody can answer a question for me.
What sites do people use mostly for analytics?
Which one specifically do you find the most useful?moneypuck
naturalstattrick
Corsica
PuckIQ
Frozenpool
Hockeyviz
Hockey-reference
CJ Sznajder
moneypuck, PuckIQ, naturalstatWhich one specifically do you find the most useful?
Thanks panda, Gonna try them out from now on.moneypuck, PuckIQ, naturalstat