For much of the game, it seemed both teams were playing at a nice pace, focused on the two points. It seemed to be what you'd want these outdoor games to evolve into over time: less novelty, and more intensity. It even got a little chippy at times. There were very good ice conditions, great weather in the 40-45F/5C range -- particularly once the shadows were no longer factors by the end of the first period. DC can easily be warmer and rainy, much as was Pittsburgh in the 2011 Winter Classic, so that was good to see.
Gradually, the officiating deteriorated and it seemed to take over the game. I thought the Caps committed some clear infractions, particularly hits from behind along the boards. You have to call those, and you have to lay off those hits. Yet beyond those automatic calls, the officials failed to successfully convey what would or would not be permissible. It's fine to call the game close, or to let everything go, as long as there is consistency so that the teams can adjust.
Caps partisans charged that the Blackhawks were not getting called for the ticky tacky stuff for which the Caps were going to the box; errors of omission on the part of officials. Chicago partisans charged that the late holding call on Toews was a blatant makeup, from officials who had let the game get away from them. Both sides have a point, I think.
NHL fans are used to inconsistent officiating, though. Special teams ended up being decisive in an uneven game. The Caps have a dreadful PK (77.8 percent, 25th in the league this year) but they fared well today, especially when down two men. The PP was solid as usual in going one for three. That's the game. Chicago lost by not burying its earlier chances, going one for six.