PuckBuddy
Green for Selke
OK so every goal of Wilson increases his odds of sticking an additional 50% then
Zeno's paradox.
OK so every goal of Wilson increases his odds of sticking an additional 50% then
Thoughts on the game, not including the goalies (who told us nothing).
I think Neuvirth told us plenty tonight, none of it good.
The first 2 he was obviously screened....
Still of the opinion that Nuevy needs a few games to get into gear which is why he's not a good back up Goalie.
Or start him in AHL in prominent role to let him andjust his offense game for a few months. Both in my eyes good options.
That would be the ideal option... but unfortunately, the agreement between the NHL and the Canadian junior leagues bars Wilson being assigned to the Bears.
Waive/assign Volpatti and use the bonus cushion and it fits by a hair.
I guess another good thing about this potential outcome is that it's a very non-permanent thing to try. Even if you lose Volpatti via waivers that's no huge loss to the organization (useful player but still, might be the epitome of replacement level), so if you do decide to return Wilson to juniors or you do decide you need to move money out of the Fs and beef up the D it's not like you crossed the point of no return by trying this to start with.
I view his faceoff skill as valuable but not vital. I imagine Oates can find a way to use better players on the PK effectively, though. Part of it is philosophical (I think puck control on the PK is that much more important because you don't get as many chances) and part anecdotal (the PK was terrible last year so nobody should be safe, though Beagle was middle of the pack in terms of getting scored on). I don't think Beagle was the problem last year, but I don't think he's the solution either so if the choice is dressing Beagle or dressing Perreault I take Perreault without blinking, given how much more useful he is overall.
Granted, if you point is not "do we think he should dress" but rather "do we think they think he should dress" that's a big point. If Oates wants 2 righty C's (and the faceoff skills etc.) badly enough then he'll shoehorn him in.
I still want Wilson in Pylmouth, aside of perhaps a 9 game trial to open the season (which, still, would require Volpatti being waived most likely). He's simply not going to get enough powerplay time in Washington, and he needs those opportunities to keep developing his offensive game. He's definitely behind Brouwer and Fehr for the center ice spot, and possibly behind Ward, Laich, and Grabovski as well (depending on how Oates' deploys those players).
Did you miss the part about the powerplay? Brouwer has always occupied the center/slot location in Oates' 1-3-1, with Ward or Fehr manning it on PP2. Grabovski and Laich also have the skillset to take that position and with neither of them playing much last year, it's still unclear where they fit on the PP.How is he behind anyone for a center spot? (esp Brouwer? Huh?)
Did you miss the part about the powerplay? Brouwer has always occupied the center/slot location in Oates' 1-3-1, with Ward or Fehr manning it on PP2. Grabovski and Laich also have the skillset to take that position and with neither of them playing much last year, it's still unclear where they fit on the PP.
Yes, I did.
In that case, yeah. Wilson's unit 2 at best. Brouwer's earned that spot on PP1 for sure.
Laich needs to show he can play without injury, but if he can, yeah, he's probably in that spot on PP2.
I'm not trying to oversell Beagle's skills, he is what he is. Agree about the PK last year, I was looking at it more in terms of the available players, not in terms of last season. I'm not suggesting sitting Perreault, fwiw, I still believe it's possible he's sitting right now not because he's not odd man out. Hard to know with all the experimenting going on, all the preseason games, Grabovski's late arrival, etc.
Butter Boy will definitely be my first, but after that I'm leaning towards Ward but with Beagle possibly being a dark horse.