He's looked bad? He's on pace for 116 points. I'd say that's pretty good. I don't see ANYTHING that would suggest he's declining.
I'd like to see these statistics. Do you have a link?
He hasn't looked bad from an absolute standpoint, but relative to his dominance post-2009? Yes he has looked bad ( I realise how spoiled we are to watch him, but it's the truth).
Here's the study of scorers' peak post-lockout.
http://www.arcticicehockey.com/2010/1/21/1261318/nhl-points-per-game-peak-age
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=903044
You'll see that around 24-25 is generally the peak for elite scorers. For all those saying that the only reason for peak scoring at ages 24-26 was because of the players in the 90s who stopped scoring as much because of a league-wide slowdown, this study was only for post-lockout, so that isn't an issue here.
Overall, I don't think a ~.1 dip in PPG compared to his career average is all that big of a deal. Hopefully when Bennett comes back he'll get top line minutes and Crosby can really start to rack them up.
It's a 0.25 dip and I think that's a huge deal. The difference between 135 and 115 is the difference between a super-elite player and a generational talent. It's a massive gulf.
Obviously it would have been nice if he didn't get hurt and would have gotten over 130 points. But to me, it's all about just staying healthy. The more years that go by with him playing full seasons the more we will forget about the couple of seasons he was hurt. That's all it comes down to.
He may not have multiple 130+ point seasons , but he will continue to put up 110+ for years to come. It's all about staying healthy and that's it. Give him a solid winger to replace dupuis and we could see him approach 130 each year.
I respect this viewpoint, but you're kind of indicating that we have in fact, then, seen his peak in 2010/11, and that he will "only" be a 110+ point player from here on out. I will always, always value peak more than longevity. Part of the reason I enjoy watching sports is to see incredible, historic feats. Crosby scoring 135 in this day and age would be one such feat, and he absolutely has/had the potential to do it. I would much rather see that than multiple 110 point seasons.
My biggest hope after he got these injuries is that Crosby would put up that "one" full dominant season, where he scored 130+ points like he is capable of. That would shut up the naysayers who say he couldn't have done it if he was healthy, and will cement his legacy because it will prove what he was capable of if he didnt have injuries.
No one is capable of that in the current NHL.
I strongly disagree. Did you watch all of his games in the 2010/11 season. Before the Winter Classic and the Steckel hit, no one could look me in the eyes and tell me with a straight face that he wouldn't have reached 130 points that year. Even with Dupuis. 2010/11 also had basically the same goals/game league average as this year.
116 points would still be his 2nd highest total, in a year where there might not be another 100 point player.
I understand this, but do you guys really think that if he wasn't healthy between 2010-2013 he wouldn't have a full season of over 130 points? All indications are that he would have - he sustained that pace for well over 200 games. The argument that it was over several seasons and he was rested is terrible because he came back from a freaking concussion and was very rusty, yet managed to keep that pace.
The fact Crosby has the chance to break his best season record this year with Pascal Dupuis on his right wing should tell you how good he has to be playing. If he had a proper 1st Line RW he'd be able to hit 130+ most likely. Right now he is on 54 in 38.
So, to get a new season best he needs 65 points in 44 games. 1.47 PPG. Possible.
I think it is most definitely possible he could finish #2 in the NHL leaders board of all time as well.
Fair enough, to all the people saying Dupuis is dragging him down. It's true. But at the same time is the 2013/14 Dupuis THAT much worse than the 2010/11 Dupuis that Crosby carried? Enough to make Crosby's production dip by 20 points? I'm not sure if I agree with that.
Saying that Crosby would hit 130 points with a better winger is all well and good, but to me that indicates that he may have passed his peak, where he could hit 130 points WITH Stone Hands Dupuis.