ncdoc
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2015
- 439
- 500
It doesn’t work this way when one guy has Makar, Toews, Manson, Girard, Walker and Byram (1 #1D, 1 #2D, 3 #3D, 1 #4D) while his competitor has Hedman and …. broken down Cernak, Perbix, Raddysh, De Haan, Fleury and some Norwegian guy (1 #1D, 1 #4D and a bunch of #6D). It’s not even close. Add here the third worst goaltending in the league from Tampa’s goalies and your argument becomes invadid. It’s a miracle that Kucherov is a net positive ES player with this team, look at Point’s plus-minus.
lol, the scoring was higher when Gretzky and Lemieux did it, and no-one has done it since, 40 goals , 100 assists.
Maybe explain why no-one else has done it ever, instead of It’s just isn’t as impressive to me,
[mod]
Lol, keeps saying "far above" yet doesn't provide the stats to support the "far above"
When Mack wins it the "Kuch was robbed of the Hart" thread will begin....bet on it.Can't wait for the winner to be announced and for this useless thread to run its course
If Kuch wins, same thing will happen,When Mack wins it the "Kuch was robbed of the Hart" thread will begin....bet on it.
Sure but Kuch isn't going to win and most people already know that.If Kuch wins, same thing will happen,
Obviously that’s your biased hope.Sure but Kuch isn't going to win and most people already know that.
Rightfully soWhen Mack wins it the "Kuch was robbed of the Hart" thread will begin....bet on it.
No actually I can read and in the last ESPN poll of the actual voters it was Mack by quite a bit.Obviously that’s your biased hope.
This one,No actually I can read and in the last ESPN poll of the actual voters it was Mack by quite a bit.
This one,
Wyshynski: Why Nikita Kucherov has the best case for the Hart Trophy
This might be the most "no wrong answers" MVP race in recent memory. But one answer is more right than the other ones.www.espn.com
Or this one
NHL Awards Watch: Kucherov takes the lead for the Hart
Our latest poll of PHWA voters produced some big changes, including for MVP and rookie of the year.africa.espn.com
Looks like ESPN has 7 votes out of 196 voters, and looks like got about 5 of 7 reading one of the articles, so 2.5% , Weird flex for 2.5% lol.
Not really, 4 points is nothing and if you want to say important to team, McDavid and Matthews have just as much of a case as Kucherov to that claim.Rightfully so
Ok where is it.ESPN had a previous more expansive look going into the last one or 2 weeks from a larger sample that had Mack at over 70% not just their in house voters.
Lol, keeps saying "far above" yet doesn't provide the stats to support the "far above"
Might be the single worst post I have seen on these forums.MacKinnon hasn't won anything because he is on the edge of elite as opposed to being elite. Always has been. That doesn't make him a bad player either but the idea that he is somehow "due" is laughable
Sure but Kuch isn't going to win and most people already know that.